From patchwork Thu Jul 26 11:51:36 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tobias Burnus X-Patchwork-Id: 173407 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19A732C0086 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 21:52:17 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1343908338; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence: List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=Flk5evN6Zg6EhE55PWW/Sn43IUk=; b=yNlijUKc3pp2jv0 0b46NAv52K0vGsNGNzlExSoxJhGlBmpXJoBXbt52nQjKWjTRi4vPPmo51coBrLqF 7DAMGcCVQRY+2GzCaPCFF3DmI+W7eOpI/w3BklD/fcBevvWAR/IOdCzrq/jkdVkC LZIMTruzXRP9cX1FQZnqCyLC5z6g= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=B4M2DTL9HTkIkGjsEBbWQU9Taxudh/GMyS2GqIpUVEE0Ul6TjBmrT9t9Z7dFeP ag1dT3RyIbUmfBi2sw/1jecbMng6PaCfQkU1O7wMwRoqVqUhGGmGfEI5l0UtuNLB InO0bJovig9xigKA55jOv5a/sN+4fXUjw7r8LBRftQRUU=; Received: (qmail 31029 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2012 11:52:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 31013 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2012 11:52:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KHOP_THREADED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx02.qsc.de (HELO mx02.qsc.de) (213.148.130.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:51:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.22] (port-92-204-86-97.dynamic.qsc.de [92.204.86.97]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3158127C7A; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:51:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50112F48.3060809@net-b.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:51:36 +0200 From: Tobias Burnus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc patches , gfortran Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, committed] Some spell fixes References: <50103532.9030508@net-b.de> In-Reply-To: <50103532.9030508@net-b.de> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On 07/25/2012 08:04 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Committed as obvious (Rev. 189859). I just saw that I missed the testsuite changes. I have now committed them as Rev. 189887. Tobias Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/contiguous_1.f90 =================================================================== --- testsuite/gfortran.dg/contiguous_1.f90 (revision 189886) +++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/contiguous_1.f90 (working copy) @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ subroutine C1241 integer, pointer, contiguous :: a(:) integer, pointer :: b(:) call test(a) - call test(b) ! { dg-error "must be simply contigous" } + call test(b) ! { dg-error "must be simply contiguous" } contains subroutine test(x) integer, pointer, contiguous :: x(:) @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ end subroutine sect12528 subroutine test34 implicit none integer, volatile,pointer :: a(:,:),i - call foo(a(2,2:3:2)) ! { dg-error "must be simply contigous" } + call foo(a(2,2:3:2)) ! { dg-error "must be simply contiguous" } contains subroutine foo(x) integer, pointer, contiguous, volatile :: x(:) Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_32.f90 =================================================================== --- testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_32.f90 (revision 189886) +++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_32.f90 (working copy) @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ implicit none procedure(my_dcos), pointer :: f - f => my_dcos ! { dg-error "invalid in procedure pointer assigment" } + f => my_dcos ! { dg-error "invalid in procedure pointer assignment" } contains real elemental function my_dcos(x) real, intent(in) :: x Index: testsuite/ChangeLog =================================================================== --- testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 189886) +++ testsuite/ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2012-07-26 Tobias Burnus + + * gfortran.dg/contiguous_1.f90: Update dg-error. + * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_32.f90: Ditto. + 2012-07-26 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/54098