From patchwork Tue Jul 17 19:48:22 2012
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Wakely
X-Patchwork-Id: 171551
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75B5E2C00C3
for ;
Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:48:46 +1000 (EST)
Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1343159328; h=Comment:
DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:
MIME-Version:Received:Received:In-Reply-To:References:Date:
Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:
Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:
List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=SRVF2qRzoQKT3QTPf19FFjfsz44=;
b=XsRXdtkNzN8liLaxsbG0un+1YyZYwtZML9JkekN4eCcXwE130RFN+3qFc7xJB2
nNs0kMike8go+qTgvl44aWOPW77v0dtG+fqNNl70zBmaTJE85w1oiagdVXrDXWWP
rdYLfce7aonWqTscOMQUurkiD2p86RJuZmVjOlFZOi+uo=
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org;
h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To;
b=qvtX2PeQS9vQuXNkCY5+6aNKP22NQR1fbVpwr6iHbLIeyjGqhU4AOmGdSXuKMM
XKUcA5u1AhcBGyoiazGlr+cz5B4RETim5eGebBIwaTWK+IUx4I98gxQpJxy1ArFe
g4l3h+RMQQ8l/p1sserNtIQ8ETaWk4cJTreushWKShFkk=;
Received: (qmail 13385 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2012 19:48:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 13366 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2012 19:48:38 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, KHOP_THREADED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com)
(209.85.217.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with
ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:48:24 +0000
Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so1195132lbo.20 for
; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.85.39 with SMTP id e7mr344848lbz.56.1342554502317;
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.27.228 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
References:
<4FFADA23.6050805@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:48:22 +0100
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: G++ namespace association extension
From: Jonathan Wakely
To: Gerald Pfeifer
Cc: Jason Merrill , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
On 16 July 2012 00:34, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> I think this also should go into the GCC 4.8 release notes
>>> (gcc-4.8/changes.html)?
>> I can do that too. There's no gcc-4.8 dir yet, do I need to copy over
>> the various other files from the gcc-4.7 dir or can I just create
>> changes.html and leave the RM to do the rest at the appropriate time?
>
> If you run `cvs up -PAd` it should magically appear. :-)
Ah yes, I'd (quite happily) forgotten how to use CVS, but have now
reinstated the ~/.cvsrc I used to have on my previous machine.
Here's what I committed.
Index: changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 changes.html
--- changes.html 15 Jul 2012 21:24:31 -0000 1.5
+++ changes.html 17 Jul 2012 19:46:32 -0000
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
directory. The installation manual contains
more information about requirements to build GCC.
+The G++ namespace association extension, __attribute ((strong))
,
+has been deprecated. Inline namespaces should be used instead.
+
General Optimizer Improvements