From patchwork Tue Jul 17 19:48:22 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Wakely X-Patchwork-Id: 171551 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75B5E2C00C3 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:48:46 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1343159328; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:Received:Received:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List: Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=SRVF2qRzoQKT3QTPf19FFjfsz44=; b=XsRXdtkNzN8liLaxsbG0un+1YyZYwtZML9JkekN4eCcXwE130RFN+3qFc7xJB2 nNs0kMike8go+qTgvl44aWOPW77v0dtG+fqNNl70zBmaTJE85w1oiagdVXrDXWWP rdYLfce7aonWqTscOMQUurkiD2p86RJuZmVjOlFZOi+uo= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=qvtX2PeQS9vQuXNkCY5+6aNKP22NQR1fbVpwr6iHbLIeyjGqhU4AOmGdSXuKMM XKUcA5u1AhcBGyoiazGlr+cz5B4RETim5eGebBIwaTWK+IUx4I98gxQpJxy1ArFe g4l3h+RMQQ8l/p1sserNtIQ8ETaWk4cJTreushWKShFkk=; Received: (qmail 13385 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2012 19:48:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 13366 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2012 19:48:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, KHOP_THREADED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:48:24 +0000 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so1195132lbo.20 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.85.39 with SMTP id e7mr344848lbz.56.1342554502317; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.27.228 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FFADA23.6050805@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:48:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: G++ namespace association extension From: Jonathan Wakely To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Jason Merrill , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On 16 July 2012 00:34, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> I think this also should go into the GCC 4.8 release notes >>> (gcc-4.8/changes.html)? >> I can do that too. There's no gcc-4.8 dir yet, do I need to copy over >> the various other files from the gcc-4.7 dir or can I just create >> changes.html and leave the RM to do the rest at the appropriate time? > > If you run `cvs up -PAd` it should magically appear. :-) Ah yes, I'd (quite happily) forgotten how to use CVS, but have now reinstated the ~/.cvsrc I used to have on my previous machine. Here's what I committed. Index: changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 changes.html --- changes.html 15 Jul 2012 21:24:31 -0000 1.5 +++ changes.html 17 Jul 2012 19:46:32 -0000 @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ directory. The installation manual contains more information about requirements to build GCC.

+

The G++ namespace association extension, __attribute ((strong)), +has been deprecated. Inline namespaces should be used instead.

+

General Optimizer Improvements