From patchwork Fri Jul 6 02:21:52 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wang Sheng-Hui X-Patchwork-Id: 169306 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AD92C0086 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:22:57 +1000 (EST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932504Ab2GFCWG (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:22:06 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:34075 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932437Ab2GFCWF (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:22:05 -0400 Received: by yenl2 with SMTP id l2so8128426yen.19 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:22:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rg8EYAFK5DEe9w5O2rY2XlPvJaaf3zzHHKb3YtW+KLs=; b=AHxgu8AUz4gARjXuPibHUobq0ztTb4vuPMucdTt15Z+eElNVlo6b5vKliQvZD3UN7x 39t3Wfy8GmpMRo8RP4M+65a6c3dooZRYWKHpHuqQaA6s4qY95UUWUbHTRODbGovS/64j hvMKiKpEd9K0SIBMKEDb4/rIJ8Fbwm5GhZCtx3/byfXVci1EQgrMfMC8gcBi6JCYgbpe EBUWNlz+Q3WuYxLgxUcXvN1XY4rkRvyMiNPkF0qxr3t6Ap2QDupN0w6BgsAGhuKSPGaO ph4ddQBDlnuwNSAZdQJ2lxqLLojpkKyQAnFczUhAx35A4pZZiBHwsNqK9iV3vPjO/VpS EX2Q== Received: by 10.66.76.34 with SMTP id h2mr41716949paw.16.1341541324031; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.115.120.178] ([202.108.130.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ms1sm20859936pbb.63.2012.07.05.19.22.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FF64BC0.40607@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:21:52 +0800 From: Wang Sheng-Hui User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix comment in extents.c/ext4_ext_check_cache Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org For the branch test, it means no valid data cached. Fix the comment here. Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 91341ec..5207b7b 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -2121,7 +2121,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_check_cache(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block, cex = &EXT4_I(inode)->i_cached_extent; sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb); - /* has cache valid data? */ + /* do not cache valid data? */ if (cex->ec_len == 0) goto errout;