From patchwork Mon Jul  2 23:28:05 2012
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [SH] Remove XFAIL from packed1.C test case
From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de>
X-Patchwork-Id: 168658
Message-Id: <1341271685.2287.9.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:28:05 +0200

Hello,

The test case g++.dg/other/packed1.C does not fail on SH.
Is it OK to remove SH from the xfail list there?

Tested with 
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=packed1.C --target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
-m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"

to confirm that the test case passes.

Cheers,
Oleg

testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/other/packed1.C: Remove SH from xfail list.


Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C	(revision 189180)
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-do run { xfail sh-*-* lm32-*-* } }
+// { dg-do run { xfail lm32-*-* } }
 
 // NMS:2003-04-21 this fails on strict aligned architectures again,
 // the patch was reverted because it broke something more important.