Patchwork [SH] Remove XFAIL from packed1.C test case

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Oleg Endo
Date July 2, 2012, 11:28 p.m.
Message ID <1341271685.2287.9.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/168658/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Oleg Endo - July 2, 2012, 11:28 p.m.
Hello,

The test case g++.dg/other/packed1.C does not fail on SH.
Is it OK to remove SH from the xfail list there?

Tested with 
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=packed1.C --target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
-m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"

to confirm that the test case passes.

Cheers,
Oleg

testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/other/packed1.C: Remove SH from xfail list.
Kaz Kojima - July 3, 2012, 12:44 a.m.
Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de> wrote:
> The test case g++.dg/other/packed1.C does not fail on SH.
> Is it OK to remove SH from the xfail list there?

OK.

Regards,
	kaz

Patch

Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C	(revision 189180)
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-// { dg-do run { xfail sh-*-* lm32-*-* } }
+// { dg-do run { xfail lm32-*-* } }
 
 // NMS:2003-04-21 this fails on strict aligned architectures again,
 // the patch was reverted because it broke something more important.