| Submitter | Oleg Endo |
|---|---|
| Date | July 2, 2012, 11:28 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1341271685.2287.9.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/168658/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de> wrote: > The test case g++.dg/other/packed1.C does not fail on SH. > Is it OK to remove SH from the xfail list there? OK. Regards, kaz
Patch
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C (revision 189180) +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/packed1.C (working copy) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -// { dg-do run { xfail sh-*-* lm32-*-* } } +// { dg-do run { xfail lm32-*-* } } // NMS:2003-04-21 this fails on strict aligned architectures again, // the patch was reverted because it broke something more important.
Hello, The test case g++.dg/other/packed1.C does not fail on SH. Is it OK to remove SH from the xfail list there? Tested with make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=packed1.C --target_board=sh-sim \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb, -m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}" to confirm that the test case passes. Cheers, Oleg testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/other/packed1.C: Remove SH from xfail list.