From patchwork Thu Jun 14 10:15:07 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tejas Belagod X-Patchwork-Id: 164877 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69D801007D1 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:15:40 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1340273741; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=NUvX6aA Q1qvFoR+t9tvUmMTa4fY=; b=S9z48I/Cam4Pyyv7ZdPeFtTtMxwasuPuGkyneRL 0Ept7IwNlMysOoBqMsLtpM1JkVbyMPW8qUNnp7T9EUDUpmdfDwqfuSmNM8yZ/9Og a3h4FEPHd9rPjH+UoYkAEaAAFwaSx9r0LL4A0DvTOL/EkB87IrUs6d7ZPwGpn60n A3vc= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-MC-Unique:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=cj8Icob3k6aKYmh4qMpYUiyx2wvq3HeezA8ZWBlFVqZ/Svo5sOuDwGM8qmSR+y Lwnmsfiu44zAX2z3SPkx1pBTGbopTZ/GgqljwsO759pq1YOuZ3Hshgp63TG5WpqZ CS0S97sT0PQFK2JWlauOiRk/cEl9U541ruIWZq8gCkEHA=; Received: (qmail 22205 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2012 10:15:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 22195 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2012 10:15:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, TW_DD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:15:24 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:15:19 +0100 Received: from [10.1.79.66] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:15:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4FD9B9AB.9090602@arm.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:15:07 +0100 From: Tejas Belagod User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" CC: Marcus Shawcroft Subject: [PATCH][AARCH64]: Remove vpadd_f64 from arm_neon.h. X-MC-Unique: 112061411151913301 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi, This patch removes vpadd_f64 from arm_neon.h because the definition is incorrect and it should be vpaddq_f64 which is defined elsewhere in the same header. OK? Thanks, Tejas. Changelog: 2012-06-14 Tejas Belagod gcc/ * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vpadd_f64): Remove. diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h index 58976cc..c6ffd27 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h @@ -13175,17 +13175,6 @@ vpadd_f32 (float32x2_t a, float32x2_t b) return result; } -__extension__ static __inline float64x2_t __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) -vpadd_f64 (float64x2_t a, float64x2_t b) -{ - float64x2_t result; - __asm__ ("faddp %0.2d,%1.2d,%2.2d" - : "=w"(result) - : "w"(a), "w"(b) - : /* No clobbers */); - return result; -} - __extension__ static __inline int8x8_t __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) vpadd_s8 (int8x8_t __a, int8x8_t __b) {