diff mbox

[net-next] iwlwifi: dont pull too much payload in skb head

Message ID 1337352513.7029.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Eric Dumazet May 18, 2012, 2:48 p.m. UTC
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Since merge window is now pretty close, I would prefer David applies
this directly in net-next, if you dont mind, as this patch is more a
core network issue than an iwlwifi one.

Thanks !

[PATCH net-next] iwlwifi: dont pull too much payload in skb head

As iwlwifi use fat skbs, it should not pull too much data in skb->head,
and particularly no tcp data payload, or splice() is slower, and TCP
coalescing is disabled. Copying payload to userland also involves at
least two copies (part from header, part from fragment)

Each layer will pull its header from the fragment as needed.

(on 64bit arches, skb_tailroom(skb) at this point is 192 bytes)

With this patch applied, I have a major reduction of collapsed/pruned
TCP packets, a nice increase of TCPRcvCoalesce counter, and overall
better Internet User experience.

Small packets are still using a fragless skb, so that page can be reused
by the driver.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Johannes Berg May 18, 2012, 2:59 p.m. UTC | #1
> Since merge window is now pretty close, I would prefer David applies this

> directly in net-next, if you dont mind, as this patch is more a core network issue

> than an iwlwifi one.

> 

> Thanks !


Sure, good with me, I don't think we have colliding patches.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>


> As iwlwifi use fat skbs, it should not pull too much data in skb->head, and

> particularly no tcp data payload, or splice() is slower, and TCP coalescing is

> disabled. Copying payload to userland also involves at least two copies (part

> from header, part from fragment)

> 

> Each layer will pull its header from the fragment as needed.

> 

> (on 64bit arches, skb_tailroom(skb) at this point is 192 bytes)

> 

> With this patch applied, I have a major reduction of collapsed/pruned TCP

> packets, a nice increase of TCPRcvCoalesce counter, and overall better Internet

> User experience.

> 

> Small packets are still using a fragless skb, so that page can be reused by the

> driver.


We may want to move this code into mac80211 later though since it also has an if (pull in everything, even reallocating if necessary, if it's a management frame), but that can wait, I think we're the only driver using paged RX.

johannes

PS: sorry about the footer -- unfortunately I haven't managed to convince IT to remove it on my @intel address
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
Eric Dumazet May 18, 2012, 3:21 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:59 +0000, Berg, Johannes wrote:
> > Since merge window is now pretty close, I would prefer David applies this
> > directly in net-next, if you dont mind, as this patch is more a core network issue
> > than an iwlwifi one.
> > 
> > Thanks !
> 
> Sure, good with me, I don't think we have colliding patches.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Thanks

> We may want to move this code into mac80211 later though since it also
> has an if (pull in everything, even reallocating if necessary, if it's
> a management frame), but that can wait, I think we're the only driver
> using paged RX.

This is OK, these frames wont be injected in linux IP/TCP stack.

Or maybe you would like an optimized version of skb_header_pointer(),
avoiding the copy if the whole blob can be part of _one_ fragment ?




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
David Miller May 18, 2012, 5:31 p.m. UTC | #3
From: "Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:59:04 +0000

>> Since merge window is now pretty close, I would prefer David applies this
>> directly in net-next, if you dont mind, as this patch is more a core network issue
>> than an iwlwifi one.
>> 
>> Thanks !
> 
> Sure, good with me, I don't think we have colliding patches.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c
index 18a3837..403de96 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c
@@ -759,7 +759,12 @@  static void iwlagn_pass_packet_to_mac80211(struct iwl_priv *priv,
 		IWL_ERR(priv, "alloc_skb failed\n");
 		return;
 	}
-	hdrlen = min_t(unsigned int, len, skb_tailroom(skb));
+	/* If frame is small enough to fit in skb->head, pull it completely.
+	 * If not, only pull ieee80211_hdr so that splice() or TCP coalesce
+	 * are more efficient.
+	 */
+	hdrlen = (len <= skb_tailroom(skb)) ? len : sizeof(*hdr);
+
 	memcpy(skb_put(skb, hdrlen), hdr, hdrlen);
 	fraglen = len - hdrlen;