clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers

* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [2008-12-29 11:00:41]:

> Hi Dave, Neil,
> 
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/net/ibmveth.c: In function 'ibmveth_poll':
> drivers/net/ibmveth.c:1034: warning: passing argument 1 of 'netif_rx_reschedule' from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/net/ibmveth.c:1034: error: too many arguments to function 'netif_rx_reschedule'
> 
> Another miss in commit 908a7a16b852ffd618a9127be8d62432182d81b4 ("net: Remove
> unused netdev arg from some NAPI interfaces").
> 
> I have added the following patch for today.
> 
> (I wonder how many more there will be? :-()
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:56:00 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] net: ibmveth NAPI interface cleanup fix
> 
> Commit 908a7a16b852ffd618a9127be8d62432182d81b4 ("net: Remove unused
> netdev arg from some NAPI interfaces") missed one spot.

Hi Stephen,

	Thanks, the patch fixes the build failure for me.

  Tested-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ibmveth.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
> index 1f055a9..9bc0f17 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
> @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static int ibmveth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  		netif_rx_complete(napi);
> 
>  		if (ibmveth_rxq_pending_buffer(adapter) &&
> -		    netif_rx_reschedule(netdev, napi)) {
> +		    netif_rx_reschedule(napi)) {
>  			lpar_rc = h_vio_signal(adapter->vdev->unit_address,
>  					       VIO_IRQ_DISABLE);
>  			goto restart_poll;
> -- 
> 1.6.0.5

I hit similar build failure due to the change in the netif_rx_reschedule()

drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function 'ehea_poll':
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:844: warning: passing argument 1 of 'netif_rx_reschedule' from incompatible pointer type
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:844: error: too many arguments to function 'netif_rx_reschedule'
make[3]: *** [drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o] Error 1

greping through the sources for the changes missed out, we have

./drivers/net/arm/ixp4xx_eth.c:507:							netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi)) {
./drivers/net/arm/ep93xx_eth.c:310:             if (more && netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi))
./drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c:657:							netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi)) {

Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
 drivers/net/arm/ep93xx_eth.c |    2 +-
 drivers/net/arm/ixp4xx_eth.c |    2 +-
 drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Hi Kamalesh,

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:55:29 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I hit similar build failure due to the change in the netif_rx_reschedule()
> 
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function 'ehea_poll':
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:844: warning: passing argument 1 of 'netif_rx_reschedule' from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:844: error: too many arguments to function 'netif_rx_reschedule'
> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o] Error 1

Linus already took a patch for ibmveth and ehea.

> greping through the sources for the changes missed out, we have
> 
	.
	.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> --
>  drivers/net/arm/ep93xx_eth.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/net/arm/ixp4xx_eth.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Thanks for the patch, I assume that Dave or Linus will take care of that.

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:37:57 -0500

> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:41:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Kamalesh,
> > 
> > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:55:29 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > greping through the sources for the changes missed out, we have
> > > 
> > 	.
> > 	.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 ...
> Thanks guys, not sure how my patch missed that.  I did an allmodconfig build
> that passed successfully.  Thanks!

It's very simple, you're not building on powerpc or ARM :-)

> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

Applied, thanks everyone.

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 06:19:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:37:57 -0500
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:41:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Kamalesh,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:55:29 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > greping through the sources for the changes missed out, we have
> > > > 
> > > 	.
> > > 	.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>  ...
> > Thanks guys, not sure how my patch missed that.  I did an allmodconfig build
> > that passed successfully.  Thanks!
> 
> It's very simple, you're not building on powerpc or ARM :-)
> 
Doh!  Stupid of me.  apologies.

> > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks everyone.
>