mbox

[GIT,PULL] ep93xx fixes for 3.5

Message ID 4FAC6548.5060008@gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5

Message

Ryan Mallon May 11, 2012, 1:03 a.m. UTC
The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:

  Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5

for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:

  dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Rafal Prylowski (2):
      arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines
      dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

 arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c |    2 +-
 drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c    |  117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Comments

Olof Johansson May 11, 2012, 6:15 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> wrote:
> The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:
>
>  Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>  git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:
>
>  dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Rafal Prylowski (2):
>      arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines
>      dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

Technically, this is a feature, not a fix. I also didn't see an ack
from the DMA maintainer on it since it would normally go in through
his tree.

Vinod, you OK with this coming through arm-soc? Looks fairly
uncontroversial so it shouldn't be a big deal but I don't know if it
might collide with anything else you have queued up.


-Olof
Vinod Koul May 11, 2012, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:15 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:
> >
> >  Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> >  git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:
> >
> >  dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Rafal Prylowski (2):
> >      arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines
> >      dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels
> 
> Technically, this is a feature, not a fix. I also didn't see an ack
> from the DMA maintainer on it since it would normally go in through
> his tree.
> 
> Vinod, you OK with this coming through arm-soc? Looks fairly
> uncontroversial so it shouldn't be a big deal but I don't know if it
> might collide with anything else you have queued up.
Looks okay to me.
For: dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA
channels

Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
Olof Johansson May 12, 2012, 7:01 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:15 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:
>> >
>> >  Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)
>> >
>> > are available in the git repository at:
>> >
>> >  git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5
>> >
>> > for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:
>> >
>> >  dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Rafal Prylowski (2):
>> >      arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines
>> >      dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels
>>
>> Technically, this is a feature, not a fix. I also didn't see an ack
>> from the DMA maintainer on it since it would normally go in through
>> his tree.
>>
>> Vinod, you OK with this coming through arm-soc? Looks fairly
>> uncontroversial so it shouldn't be a big deal but I don't know if it
>> might collide with anything else you have queued up.
> Looks okay to me.
> For: dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA
> channels
>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>


Thanks!

Ryan, since the branch has one board fix and one driver feature, I
pulled it into our next/drivers branch instead of fixes. Either way,
it's queued for the merge window now.



-Olof