diff mbox

[1/2] block: make bdrv_create adopt coroutine

Message ID 1336188532-28038-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Zhiyong Wu May 5, 2012, 3:28 a.m. UTC
From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 block.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Kevin Wolf May 7, 2012, 8:32 a.m. UTC | #1
Am 05.05.2012 05:28, schrieb zwu.kernel@gmail.com:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  block.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

What's this? A version 2 of half the patch series, with the implicit
assumption that I should take patch 2 from version 1? You should resend
the whole series, you should ensure proper email threading, and you
should include a v2 in the subject line (git format-patch
--subject-prefix="PATCH v2"). Your commit messages are lacking, too. I
have no idea _why_ you are making the change.

In short: Please read http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch once
again and be sure to follow its advices.

Kevin
Zhiyong Wu May 7, 2012, 8:39 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> Am 05.05.2012 05:28, schrieb zwu.kernel@gmail.com:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  block.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> What's this? A version 2 of half the patch series, with the implicit
> assumption that I should take patch 2 from version 1? You should resend
> the whole series, you should ensure proper email threading, and you
> should include a v2 in the subject line (git format-patch
OK, will send v2.
> --subject-prefix="PATCH v2"). Your commit messages are lacking, too. I
> have no idea _why_ you are making the change.
The patchset will fix one issue about qcow2 preallocation function
reported by marcandre.

>
> In short: Please read http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch once
> again and be sure to follow its advices.
>
> Kevin
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 43c794c..5de55fe 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -341,13 +341,59 @@  BlockDriver *bdrv_find_whitelisted_format(const char *format_name)
     return drv && bdrv_is_whitelisted(drv) ? drv : NULL;
 }
 
+typedef struct CreateCo {
+    BlockDriver *drv;
+    char *filename;
+    QEMUOptionParameter *options;
+    int ret;
+} CreateCo;
+
+static void coroutine_fn bdrv_create_co_entry(void *opaque)
+{
+    CreateCo *cco = opaque;
+    assert(cco->drv);
+
+    cco->ret = cco->drv->bdrv_create(cco->filename, cco->options);
+}
+
+static int bdrv_create_co(BlockDriver *drv,
+                          const char *filename,
+                          QEMUOptionParameter *options)
+{
+    int ret;
+
+    Coroutine *co;
+    CreateCo cco = {
+        .drv = drv,
+        .filename = g_strdup(filename),
+        .options = options,
+        .ret = NOT_DONE,
+    };
+
+    if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
+        /* Fast-path if already in coroutine context */
+        bdrv_create_co_entry(&cco);
+    } else {
+        co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_create_co_entry);
+        qemu_coroutine_enter(co, &cco);
+        while (cco.ret == NOT_DONE) {
+            qemu_aio_wait();
+        }
+    }
+
+    ret = cco.ret;
+    g_free(cco.filename);
+
+    return ret;
+}
+
 int bdrv_create(BlockDriver *drv, const char* filename,
     QEMUOptionParameter *options)
 {
     if (!drv->bdrv_create)
         return -ENOTSUP;
 
-    return drv->bdrv_create(filename, options);
+    return bdrv_create_co(drv, filename, options);
 }
 
 int bdrv_create_file(const char* filename, QEMUOptionParameter *options)