| Message ID | 1334675140-20303-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
On 17:05 Tue 17 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > As sam-ba is deliver as a binary for x86 > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > --- ping Best Regards, J.
On 08:50 Mon 23 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 17:05 Tue 17 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > As sam-ba is deliver as a binary for x86 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > --- > ping ping Best Regards, J.
On 12:19 Fri 27 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 08:50 Mon 23 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 17:05 Tue 17 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > As sam-ba is deliver as a binary for x86 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > > --- > > ping > ping > ping Best Regards, J.
On 07:01 Fri 04 May , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 12:19 Fri 27 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 08:50 Mon 23 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 17:05 Tue 17 Apr , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > As sam-ba is deliver as a binary for x86 > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > > > --- > > > ping > > ping > > > ping it's the for ping did I need to understand that noe one care of non x86 host? Best Regards, J.
>>>>> "Jean-Christophe" == Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> writes:
Jean-Christophe> it's the for ping
Jean-Christophe> did I need to understand that noe one care of non x86 host?
To me it is more of a question of tradeoffs. Either we do it really
right and use this kind of infrastructure for the external toolchains as
well (where it really matters), or we decide the extra complexity isn't
worth it for the few non-x86 users.
I haven't made up my mind about this yet, but am leaning towards the
2nd.
On 16:34 Mon 07 May , Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Jean-Christophe" == Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> writes: > > Jean-Christophe> it's the for ping > > Jean-Christophe> did I need to understand that noe one care of non x86 host? > > To me it is more of a question of tradeoffs. Either we do it really > right and use this kind of infrastructure for the external toolchains as > well (where it really matters), or we decide the extra complexity isn't > worth it for the few non-x86 users. > > I haven't made up my mind about this yet, but am leaning towards the > 2nd. as a non x86 user I really care and as the ARM A15 will come soon on the market for serer as example it will be more and more problematic for binary package Best Regards, J. > > -- > Bye, Peter Korsgaard
On 05/07/12 17:57, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> > Jean-Christophe> did I need to understand that noe one care of non x86 host? >> > >> > To me it is more of a question of tradeoffs. Either we do it really >> > right and use this kind of infrastructure for the external toolchains as >> > well (where it really matters), or we decide the extra complexity isn't >> > worth it for the few non-x86 users. >> > >> > I haven't made up my mind about this yet, but am leaning towards the >> > 2nd. > as a non x86 user I really care > > and as the ARM A15 will come soon on the market for serer as example it will > be more and more problematic for binary package ... except that it's not really problematic. The only problem is that you can configure buildroot to download something that won't actually run on your system. This problem is a lot worse for external toolchains than for sam-ba. That said, the patch is really simple and doesn't create a maintenance burden. Having it in paves the way for disallowing other downloaded host binaries, and for downloading host binaries for the correct platform. Therefore: Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> Jean-Christophe, maybe it's worthwhile to resend and perhaps add a patch for external toolchains as well? Regards, Arnout
diff --git a/package/sam-ba/Config.in.host b/package/sam-ba/Config.in.host index f2ea01f..20b2b36 100644 --- a/package/sam-ba/Config.in.host +++ b/package/sam-ba/Config.in.host @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_SAM_BA bool "host sam-ba" + depends on BR2_HOSTARCH = "x86_64" || BR2_HOSTARCH = "x86" help Atmel SAM-BA software provides an open set of tools for programming the Atmel SAM3, SAM7 and SAM9 ARM-based
As sam-ba is deliver as a binary for x86 Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> --- package/sam-ba/Config.in.host | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)