Message ID | 1334214969-19664-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Marek Vasut |
Headers | show |
Dear Lukasz Majewski, > This commit adds support for storing private data to Samsung's UDC > driver. This data is afterward used by usb gadget. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c index f7f7b54..cb4916c 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > @@ -133,6 +133,18 @@ static void nuke(struct s3c_ep *ep, int status); > static int s3c_udc_set_halt(struct usb_ep *_ep, int value); > static void s3c_udc_set_nak(struct s3c_ep *ep); > > +void set_udc_gadget_private_data(void *p) > +{ > + printf("%s: the_controller: 0x%p, p: 0x%p\n", __func__, > + the_controller, p); > + the_controller->gadget.dev.device_data = p; > +} > + > +void *get_udc_gadget_private_data(struct usb_gadget *gadget) > +{ > + return gadget->dev.device_data; > +} > + Is this part of some bigger patchset or are you simply adding dead code? > static struct usb_ep_ops s3c_ep_ops = { > .enable = s3c_ep_enable, > .disable = s3c_ep_disable, Best regards, Marek Vasut
Dear Lukasz Majewski, In message <1334214969-19664-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> you wrote: > This commit adds support for storing private data to Samsung's UDC > driver. This data is afterward used by usb gadget. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> ... > +void set_udc_gadget_private_data(void *p) > +{ > + printf("%s: the_controller: 0x%p, p: 0x%p\n", __func__, s/printf/debug/ ?? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
Hi Marek Vasut, > Dear Lukasz Majewski, > > > This commit adds support for storing private data to Samsung's UDC > > driver. This data is afterward used by usb gadget. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > > --- > > drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > > b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c index f7f7b54..cb4916c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > > @@ -133,6 +133,18 @@ static void nuke(struct s3c_ep *ep, int > > status); static int s3c_udc_set_halt(struct usb_ep *_ep, int value); > > static void s3c_udc_set_nak(struct s3c_ep *ep); > > > > +void set_udc_gadget_private_data(void *p) > > +{ > > + printf("%s: the_controller: 0x%p, p: 0x%p\n", __func__, > > + the_controller, p); > > + the_controller->gadget.dev.device_data = p; > > +} > > + > > +void *get_udc_gadget_private_data(struct usb_gadget *gadget) > > +{ > > + return gadget->dev.device_data; > > +} > > + > > Is this part of some bigger patchset or are you simply adding dead > code? Yes, this is the part of a bigger patchset :-) - the composite gadget (g_dnl) requires this change. e.g. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/151989/ > > > static struct usb_ep_ops s3c_ep_ops = { > > .enable = s3c_ep_enable, > > .disable = s3c_ep_disable, > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut
Dear Lukasz Majewski, > Hi Marek Vasut, > > > Dear Lukasz Majewski, > > > > > This commit adds support for storing private data to Samsung's UDC > > > driver. This data is afterward used by usb gadget. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > > > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > > > b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c index f7f7b54..cb4916c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c > > > @@ -133,6 +133,18 @@ static void nuke(struct s3c_ep *ep, int > > > status); static int s3c_udc_set_halt(struct usb_ep *_ep, int value); > > > > > > static void s3c_udc_set_nak(struct s3c_ep *ep); > > > > > > +void set_udc_gadget_private_data(void *p) > > > +{ > > > + printf("%s: the_controller: 0x%p, p: 0x%p\n", __func__, > > > + the_controller, p); > > > + the_controller->gadget.dev.device_data = p; > > > +} > > > + > > > +void *get_udc_gadget_private_data(struct usb_gadget *gadget) > > > +{ > > > + return gadget->dev.device_data; > > > +} > > > + > > > > Is this part of some bigger patchset or are you simply adding dead > > code? > > Yes, this is the part of a bigger patchset :-) - the composite gadget > (g_dnl) requires this change. > > e.g. > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/151989/ Can you please make it into a patchset then? You know -- so we all know what this is part of. > > > > static struct usb_ep_ops s3c_ep_ops = { > > > > > > .enable = s3c_ep_enable, > > > .disable = s3c_ep_disable, > > > > Best regards, > > Marek Vasut Best regards, Marek Vasut
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c index f7f7b54..cb4916c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c_udc_otg.c @@ -133,6 +133,18 @@ static void nuke(struct s3c_ep *ep, int status); static int s3c_udc_set_halt(struct usb_ep *_ep, int value); static void s3c_udc_set_nak(struct s3c_ep *ep); +void set_udc_gadget_private_data(void *p) +{ + printf("%s: the_controller: 0x%p, p: 0x%p\n", __func__, + the_controller, p); + the_controller->gadget.dev.device_data = p; +} + +void *get_udc_gadget_private_data(struct usb_gadget *gadget) +{ + return gadget->dev.device_data; +} + static struct usb_ep_ops s3c_ep_ops = { .enable = s3c_ep_enable, .disable = s3c_ep_disable,