Patchwork [GIT,PULL,3/4] Samsung devel-mmc for v3.4

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Kukjin Kim
Date March 10, 2012, 4:08 p.m.
Message ID <4F5B7C8D.5000805@samsung.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/146319/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git

Comments

Kukjin Kim - March 10, 2012, 4:08 p.m.
Hi Arnd, Olof

This is regarding Samsung mmc for v3.4.

As a note, v3.4-for-cjb branch is merged into mmc/mmc-next like following:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=fcd9bdae386753531a9cb6b2577359a83f4e121c

And others are accordingly changes on regarding mmc.

Please pull and if any problems, please kindly let me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

The following changes since commit 192cfd58774b4d17b2fe8bdc77d89c2ef4e0591d:

   Linux 3.3-rc6 (2012-03-03 17:08:09 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:
   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git 
next/devel-samsung-mmc

Jaehoon Chung (3):
       ARM: SAMSUNG: support the second capability for samsung-soc
       mmc: sdhci-s3c: add platform data for the second capability
       ARM: SAMSUNG: change the name from s3c-sdhci to exynos4-sdhci

Kukjin Kim (1):
       Merge branch 'v3.4-for-cjb' into next/devel-samsung-mmc

Thomas Abraham (6):
       mmc: sdhci-s3c: Remove usage of clk_type member in platform data
       ARM: EXYNOS: use 'exynos4-sdhci' as device name for sdhci controllers
       ARM: SAMSUNG: remove all uses of clk_type member in sdhci 
platform data
       mmc: sdhci-s3c: derive transfer width host capability from 
max_width in platform data
       mmc: sdhci-s3c: Keep a copy of platform data and use it
       mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add device tree support

  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung-sdhci.txt      |   70 ++++++
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock.c                       |   24 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c                      |    5 +
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-armlex4210.c             |    3 -
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c                   |    7 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c                 |    2 -
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c               |    2 -
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c               |    4 -
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c         |    4 +-
  arch/arm/plat-samsung/devs.c                       |    4 -
  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/sdhci.h         |   37 +++-
  arch/arm/plat-samsung/platformdata.c               |    4 +-
  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c                       |  238 
+++++++++++++++++++-
  13 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung-sdhci.txt
Kukjin Kim - March 11, 2012, 8:13 a.m.
On 03/10/12 10:10, Olof Johansson wrote:
 > On 03/10/12 10:08, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>  wrote:
>>> Hi Arnd, Olof
>>>
>>> This is regarding Samsung mmc for v3.4.
>>>
>>> As a note, v3.4-for-cjb branch is merged into mmc/mmc-next like following:
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=fcd9bdae386753531a9cb6b2577359a83f4e121c
>>
>> Looking at this series, there's really only one patch that is not in
>> the mmc tree:
>>
>> ARM: SAMSUNG: change the name from s3c-sdhci to exynos4-sdhci
>>
>> And all it does is change the platform device string contents.
>>
>> Since there are no build-time dependencies between this and the MMC
>> change, I suggest you send only this patch so that we avoid having
>> merge dependencies where not strictly needed.
>>
>> Would that be OK with you? If so, please send a fresh pull request
>> with only the above change in it.
>>
>>
>Sorry, I misread the series when browsing it. Looks like there are two
 > more patches in it:
 >
 > mmc: sdhci-s3c: add platform data for the second capability
 > ARM: SAMSUNG: support the second capability for samsung-soc
 >
 > But the original suggestion remains, since those two seem to be
 > unrelated to the branch sent to Chris. So please resend with just
 > those patches, please?
 >
OK, I agree. Let me do it soon.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.