Patchwork [GIT,PULL] DaVinci DM644x video display support

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Sekhar Nori
Date March 8, 2012, 7:23 p.m.
Message ID <DF0F476B391FA8409C78302C7BA518B6317EEB34@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/145615/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git v3.4/features

Comments

Sekhar Nori - March 8, 2012, 7:23 p.m.
Hi Arnd, Olof,

Can you please pull these two patches adding support
for DaVinci DM644x V4L2 display support for v3.4.

These patches heavily depend on the clean-up series sent earlier.
Since the clean-up series is already included in for-next branch
of arm-soc, I have generated a request using that as baseline.

Let me know if that's not desirable, and I can do it any
other way you want.

Thanks,
Sekhar

The following changes since commit 3a034af7c1a3c55014eeb15a9c9430e9f72810e4:
  Arnd Bergmann (1):
        Merge branch 'next/fixes-non-critical' into for-next

are available in the git repository at:

  git://gitorious.org/linux-davinci/linux-davinci.git v3.4/features

Manjunath Hadli (2):
      ARM: davinci: dm644x: add support for v4l2 video display
      ARM: davinci: dm644x evm: add support for VPBE display

 arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h          |    8 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c           |  166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Olof Johansson - March 10, 2012, 4:30 p.m.
Hi,

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Nori, Sekhar <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Olof,
>
> Can you please pull these two patches adding support
> for DaVinci DM644x V4L2 display support for v3.4.
>
> These patches heavily depend on the clean-up series sent earlier.
> Since the clean-up series is already included in for-next branch
> of arm-soc, I have generated a request using that as baseline.
>
> Let me know if that's not desirable, and I can do it any
> other way you want.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
> The following changes since commit 3a034af7c1a3c55014eeb15a9c9430e9f72810e4:
>  Arnd Bergmann (1):
>        Merge branch 'next/fixes-non-critical' into for-next

It looks like this branch is based on the contents of the for-next
branch. That's not a stable base so I can't pull it.

If you need it to build on contents already in arm-soc, you need to
base it on either your own cleanup branch, or the aggregate next/*
branch in arm-soc. for-next is rebuilt, and is never sent up to Linus
in it's current form.

Since you said they require the cleanup branch as a base, please
rebase them on top of next/cleanup instead.

Thanks!


-Olof
Sekhar Nori - March 11, 2012, 6:10 a.m.
Hi Olof,

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 22:00:18, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Nori, Sekhar <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:

[...]

> > The following changes since commit 3a034af7c1a3c55014eeb15a9c9430e9f72810e4:
> >  Arnd Bergmann (1):
> >        Merge branch 'next/fixes-non-critical' into for-next
> 
> It looks like this branch is based on the contents of the for-next
> branch. That's not a stable base so I can't pull it.
> 
> If you need it to build on contents already in arm-soc, you need to
> base it on either your own cleanup branch, or the aggregate next/*
> branch in arm-soc. for-next is rebuilt, and is never sent up to Linus
> in it's current form.
> 
> Since you said they require the cleanup branch as a base, please
> rebase them on top of next/cleanup instead.

Thanks for the feedback. I will re-submit this pull request.

Regards,
Sekhar