Message ID | 20120302203833.GB2179@intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:38 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote: > We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode. > OK for trunk? > 2012-03-02 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> > > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle > zero-extended DImode addresses. OK. Thanks, Uros.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote: >> We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode. >> OK for trunk? > >> 2012-03-02 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> >> >> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle >> zero-extended DImode addresses. > > OK. The patch was reverted due to PR target/52530. Uros.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index 2cbfb64..7cb8fda 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -14511,7 +14511,7 @@ ix86_print_operand_address (FILE *file, rtx addr) /* Print SImode registers for zero-extended addresses to force addr32 prefix. Otherwise print DImode registers to avoid it. */ - if (TARGET_64BIT) + if (TARGET_64BIT && GET_MODE (addr) == DImode) code = ((GET_CODE (addr) == ZERO_EXTEND || GET_CODE (addr) == AND) ? 'l'