Patchwork [GIT,PULL] One more sched_clock() patch

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Marc Zyngier
Date Feb. 27, 2012, 8:44 a.m.
Message ID <322c288d3ad6aecc8014e0a3582c8527@localhost>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/143161/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git

Comments

Marc Zyngier - Feb. 27, 2012, 8:44 a.m.
Russell,

Could you please pull from my sched_clock-for-rmk branch again?
It contains a single additional patch. courtesy of Stephen Boyd, that
contains support for sched_clock() on msm. The rest of the branch is
unchanged.

Thanks,

        M.

The following changes since commit
6905a65879b51d326396e63dfea40861a30bc17f:

  ARM: Make the sched_clock framework mandatory (2012-02-03 11:34:27
+0000)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git
sched_clock-for-rmk

Stephen Boyd (1):
      msm: timer: Support sched_clock()

 arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Stephen Boyd - March 7, 2012, 9:32 p.m.
On 02/27/12 00:44, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Russell,
>
> Could you please pull from my sched_clock-for-rmk branch again?
> It contains a single additional patch. courtesy of Stephen Boyd, that
> contains support for sched_clock() on msm. The rest of the branch is
> unchanged.

Has this been pulled? I don't see this showing up in linux-next as of
20120307.
Russell King - ARM Linux - March 7, 2012, 9:38 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 01:32:23PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/27/12 00:44, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Russell,
> >
> > Could you please pull from my sched_clock-for-rmk branch again?
> > It contains a single additional patch. courtesy of Stephen Boyd, that
> > contains support for sched_clock() on msm. The rest of the branch is
> > unchanged.
> 
> Has this been pulled? I don't see this showing up in linux-next as of
> 20120307.

Probably not yet, because I really don't like seeing a trickle of "some
more to fix" pull request followed by "oh another one to fix" pull
request, especially when they get pulled into devel-stable.

I'm waiting a bit to see if there's any more on their way. ;)