From patchwork Tue Dec 16 02:33:08 2008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [4/4] UBI WL-Subsys: Improvement in prot tree Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:33:08 -0000 From: xiaochuan-xu X-Patchwork-Id: 14151 Message-Id: <429394196.23259@cqu.edu.cn> To: dedekind@infradead.org Cc: linux-mtd On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 18:00 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Amended and pushed to ubi-2.6.git tree. Thanks! These two sentences should switch in the 'ubi_wl_get_peb()' function: - prot_queue_add(ubi, e); dbg_wl("PEB %d EC %d", e->pnum, e->ec); + prot_queue_add(ubi, e); "get" message should print before "add to prot-queue", which is more descriptive IMO. >From 83811c383bf70039aae53e1bbc7311899ea4abcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xiaochuan-Xu Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:10:20 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] several comments amendment Signed-off-by: Xiaochuan-Xu --- drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 7 +++---- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c index d50060f..4fe3f25 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ * As it was said, for the UBI sub-system all physical eraseblocks are either * "free" or "used". Free eraseblock are kept in the @wl->free RB-tree, while * used eraseblocks are kept in @wl->used or @wl->scrub RB-trees, or in - * (temporarily) in the @wl->pq queue. + * (temporarily) the @wl->pq queue. * * When the WL sub-system returns a physical eraseblock, the physical * eraseblock is protected from being moved for some "time". For this reason, @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ * struct ubi_work - UBI work description data structure. * @list: a link in the list of pending works * @func: worker function - * @priv: private data of the worker function * @e: physical eraseblock to erase * @torture: if the physical eraseblock has to be tortured * @@ -455,8 +454,8 @@ retry: * be protected from being moved for some time. */ rb_erase(&e->u.rb, &ubi->free); - prot_queue_add(ubi, e); dbg_wl("PEB %d EC %d", e->pnum, e->ec); + prot_queue_add(ubi, e); spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock); return e->pnum; } @@ -1223,7 +1222,7 @@ int ubi_wl_flush(struct ubi_device *ubi) int err; /* - * Erase while the pending works queue is not empty, but not more then + * Erase while the pending works queue is not empty, but not more than * the number of currently pending works. */ dbg_wl("flush (%d pending works)", ubi->works_count);