Patchwork [4/4] UBI WL-Subsys: Improvement in prot tree

login
register
mail settings
Submitter xiaochuan-xu
Date Dec. 16, 2008, 2:33 a.m.
Message ID <429394196.23259@cqu.edu.cn>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/14151/
State New, archived
Headers show

Comments

xiaochuan-xu - Dec. 16, 2008, 2:33 a.m.
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 18:00 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Amended and pushed to ubi-2.6.git tree.
Thanks!

These two sentences should switch in the 'ubi_wl_get_peb()' function:

-	prot_queue_add(ubi, e);
 	dbg_wl("PEB %d EC %d", e->pnum, e->ec);
+	prot_queue_add(ubi, e);

"get" message should print before "add to prot-queue",
which is more descriptive IMO.


>From 83811c383bf70039aae53e1bbc7311899ea4abcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiaochuan-Xu <xiaochuan-xu@cqu.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:10:20 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] several comments amendment

Signed-off-by: Xiaochuan-Xu <xiaochuan-xu@cqu.edu.cn>
---
 drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c |    7 +++----
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
index d50060f..4fe3f25 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ 
  * As it was said, for the UBI sub-system all physical eraseblocks are either
  * "free" or "used". Free eraseblock are kept in the @wl->free RB-tree, while
  * used eraseblocks are kept in @wl->used or @wl->scrub RB-trees, or in
- * (temporarily) in the @wl->pq queue.
+ * (temporarily) the @wl->pq queue.
  *
  * When the WL sub-system returns a physical eraseblock, the physical
  * eraseblock is protected from being moved for some "time". For this reason,
@@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ 
  * struct ubi_work - UBI work description data structure.
  * @list: a link in the list of pending works
  * @func: worker function
- * @priv: private data of the worker function
  * @e: physical eraseblock to erase
  * @torture: if the physical eraseblock has to be tortured
  *
@@ -455,8 +454,8 @@  retry:
 	 * be protected from being moved for some time.
 	 */
 	rb_erase(&e->u.rb, &ubi->free);
-	prot_queue_add(ubi, e);
 	dbg_wl("PEB %d EC %d", e->pnum, e->ec);
+	prot_queue_add(ubi, e);
 	spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
 	return e->pnum;
 }
@@ -1223,7 +1222,7 @@  int ubi_wl_flush(struct ubi_device *ubi)
 	int err;
 
 	/*
-	 * Erase while the pending works queue is not empty, but not more then
+	 * Erase while the pending works queue is not empty, but not more than
 	 * the number of currently pending works.
 	 */
 	dbg_wl("flush (%d pending works)", ubi->works_count);