From patchwork Tue Jan 31 12:10:43 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wolfram Sang X-Patchwork-Id: 138765 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4978:20e::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5931007D2 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:12:06 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RsCYD-0004dV-1Y; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:11:05 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:770:15f::2]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RsCY9-0004c8-5K for linux-mtd@merlin.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:11:01 +0000 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RsCY6-0003c8-5a for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:10:59 +0000 Received: from katana.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:2:221:70ff:fe71:1890] helo=pengutronix.de) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsCXz-00052v-Vz; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:10:51 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:10:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1328011843-7402-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.8.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:221:70ff:fe71:1890 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: w.sang@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20120131_121058_733497_D6C5B8EF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.32 ) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on casper.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: Huang Shijie , Wolfram Sang , Artem Bityutskiy X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org This has been moved from .options to .bbt_options meanwhile. So, it currently checks for something totally different (NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) and decides according to that. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Cc: Huang Shijie Acked-by: Brian Norris Acked-by: Huang Shijie --- Artem: NAND_OWN_BUFFERS should not get set, so no danger. But I'd think we should add the stable tag nonetheless if Huang is fine with this change. drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c index 493ec2f..f39f83e 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c @@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ static int gpmi_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs) chip->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1); /* Do we have a flash based bad block table ? */ - if (chip->options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH) + if (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH) ret = nand_update_bbt(mtd, ofs); else { chipnr = (int)(ofs >> chip->chip_shift);