[1/1] wireless: remove return in _rtl_pci_switch_clk_req

From: "Devendra.Naga" <devendra.aaru@gmail.com>

the return value from _rtl_pci_switch_clk_req is not used by any of its callers.

Signed-off-by: Devendra.Naga <devendra.aaru@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

On 01/30/2012 06:46 AM, Devendra.Naga wrote:
> From: "Devendra.Naga"<devendra.aaru@gmail.com>
>
> the return value from _rtl_pci_switch_clk_req is not used by any of its callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devendra.Naga<devendra.aaru@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c |    3 +--
>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

The patch is OK, but the patch subject is bad. You should have "[PATCH] 
rtlwifi:...". Your patch is for rtlwifi, not wireless.

Larry

>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c
> index 4326fd1..35f4a0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static bool _rtl_pci_platform_switch_device_pci_aspm(
>   }
>
>   /*When we set 0x01 to enable clk request. Set 0x0 to disable clk req.*/
> -static bool _rtl_pci_switch_clk_req(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 value)
> +static void _rtl_pci_switch_clk_req(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 value)
>   {
>   	struct rtl_pci *rtlpci = rtl_pcidev(rtl_pcipriv(hw));
>   	struct rtl_hal *rtlhal = rtl_hal(rtl_priv(hw));
> @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ static bool _rtl_pci_switch_clk_req(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 value)
>   	if (rtlhal->hw_type == HARDWARE_TYPE_RTL8192SE)
>   		udelay(100);
>
> -	return true;
>   }
>
>   /*Disable RTL8192SE ASPM&  Disable Pci Bridge ASPM*/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 17:35 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> The patch is OK, but the patch subject is bad. You should have "[PATCH] 
> rtlwifi:...". Your patch is for rtlwifi, not wireless.

Hi Devendra.

A reasonable rule of thumb is use the deepest directory
path basename you can to prefix the patch.
Something like:

[PATCH] $(basename $(dirname $file)): terse description

If you are patching drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/apt.c
this becomes:

[PATCH] realtek: terse description

There are some exceptions though.  One of them
is if the patch is in staging, prefix with
[PATCH] staging: $(basename $(dirname $file)): description

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 17:35 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>> The patch is OK, but the patch subject is bad. You should have "[PATCH]
>> rtlwifi:...". Your patch is for rtlwifi, not wireless.
>
Will post a new patch, Thanks !!
> Hi Devendra.
>
> A reasonable rule of thumb is use the deepest directory
> path basename you can to prefix the patch.
> Something like:
>
> [PATCH] $(basename $(dirname $file)): terse description
>
> If you are patching drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/apt.c
> this becomes:
>
> [PATCH] realtek: terse description
>
> There are some exceptions though.  One of them
> is if the patch is in staging, prefix with
> [PATCH] staging: $(basename $(dirname $file)): description
>
> cheers, Joe
>
Thanks a lot Joe, will follow your suggestions :).

Devendra.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html