From patchwork Tue Jan 24 05:24:15 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Benjamin Kosnik X-Patchwork-Id: 137508 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 743B6B6EEA for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:24:41 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1327987482; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=lvP82r6iucY5neuxSu3JTrn54fY=; b=Ir0jwhAYbyWmWeD TLK+TW3vn30D+aeuyMVgJvsD/qjCF9g3Ek5c1hC/dXUjfepagLyeSAAeXQtkg7Gn 8P6DatQuD0kQjFZzUcBWWIYM+x0hY3DpCqiElHN0UP9faI7IPmqXO+6P42FVkJ0u d3djYv8yzKd2ofAmeGx+OZ3bWFMA= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=bTaP7tI8oEuxn8BVJnIkp0sSYxG2vYx+rAiiK0zxtXQgvvCeS3aTjr/qKqVGcE 7Hs2OwfEmu+aPX0NBF/c/+aNDNdlkAVHtRfGjjoM6mSfU/aU26dZ6mI7w0AvH2qS W7HMQdip2j368i2EtxOHfZl6hv70rWrP0lMQC9zjEmYg8=; Received: (qmail 32541 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2012 05:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 32525 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2012 05:24:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:24:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0O5OGHn030186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:24:16 -0500 Received: from shotwell (ovpn-113-153.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.153]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0O5OFxJ029532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:24:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:24:15 -0800 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [v3] libstdc++/49829 Message-ID: <20120123212415.59c7c6e8@shotwell> In-Reply-To: <20120123152716.67be01bb@shotwell> References: <20120123152716.67be01bb@shotwell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > tested x86-64/linux > tested x86-64/linux -x- arm-eabi > tested x86-64/linux -x- cris-elf Here is the missing bit, as tested above. -benjamin diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am b/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am index aa25a7e..87b2a16 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am +++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am @@ -184,9 +184,9 @@ endif libstdc++convenience.la: $(toolexeclib_LTLIBRARIES) $(CXXLINK) $(libstdc___la_LIBADD) $(LIBS); \ if test ! -f .libs/libstdc++.a; then \ - $(LN_S) .libs/libstdc++convenience.a .libs/libstdc++.a; \ - stamp-libstdc++convenience; \ - fi; + cp .libs/libstdc++convenience.a .libs/libstdc++.a; \ + fi; \ + echo `date` > stamp-libstdc++convenience; debugdir = debug