diff mbox

PR middle-end/51212: sorry out on -fgnu-tm + -fnon-call-exceptions

Message ID 4F0469D1.9050206@redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Aldy Hernandez Jan. 4, 2012, 3:01 p.m. UTC 
On 01/04/12 08:55, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 01/03/12 14:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 01/04/2012 01:10 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> I can certainly do this. I am however, waiting for the final
>>> approval. It wasn't clear whether that was an approval from Richard
>>> Henderson, or whether I should wait for an official ok.
>>>
>>> OK for mainline?
>>
>> Yes, it was approval.
>>
>>
>> r~
>
> Richi, this is the patch I committed with your suggestions for the
> documentation (*). Let me know if you'd like it worded different.
>
> (*) Note, the test got committed by mistake in my previous commit a few
> minutes ago along with my previous fix. Sorry about that.

Arghhh... It seems I had already committed this patch before the 
holidays, but I had mistakenly thought it hadn't been approved nor 
committed.  Consequently, the last patch was a duplicate (with the 
exception of the documentation change).

I am embarrassingly committing the following.  Blame it on the holiday 
mojitos.
* opts.c (finish_options): Remove duplicate sorry.
diff mbox

Patch

Index: opts.c
===================================================================
--- opts.c	(revision 182877)
+++ opts.c	(working copy)
@@ -666,9 +666,6 @@  finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts
   if (opts->x_flag_tm && opts->x_flag_non_call_exceptions)
     sorry ("transactional memory is not supported with non-call exceptions");
 
-  if (opts->x_flag_tm && opts->x_flag_non_call_exceptions)
-    sorry ("transactional memory is not supported with non-call exceptions");
-
   /* -Wmissing-noreturn is alias for -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn.  */
   if (opts->x_warn_missing_noreturn)
     opts->x_warn_suggest_attribute_noreturn = true;