Message ID | 20111229141508.GA3146@merkur.ravnborg.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:15:08 +0100 > While chasing following warning from kconfig I noticed that the > kconfig preemption model symbols were all dependent on sparc64. > > warning: (PREEMPT && DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP) selects PREEMPT_COUNT which has unmet direct dependencies (SPARC64) > >>From arch/sparc/Kconfig: > > if SPARC64 > source "kernel/Kconfig.preempt" > endif > > But looking a bit closer I see nothing obvious why > sparc32 should not support the various preemption models. > Drop the "if SPARC64" conditional to enable selection of > preemption model on sparc32 too. > > Build-tested - but not run-time tested all three models. > > Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig index 27060b2..7cb8adf 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig @@ -386,9 +386,7 @@ config SCHED_MC making when dealing with multi-core CPU chips at a cost of slightly increased overhead in some places. If unsure say N here. -if SPARC64 source "kernel/Kconfig.preempt" -endif config CMDLINE_BOOL bool "Default bootloader kernel arguments"