Patchwork Pull Requeset: Exynos4 Register Address Update for Devfreq Drivers.

login
register
mail settings
Submitter MyungJoo Ham
Date Dec. 21, 2011, 7:45 a.m.
Message ID <CAJ0PZbQ1=+BTs0Emi78kfOWD5d90+ND5Jc_SJ9T4BcGMXyny9A@mail.gmail.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/132590/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung.git devfreq-for-samsung

Comments

MyungJoo Ham - Dec. 21, 2011, 7:45 a.m.
Hello,

Please pull the patches for Exynos4 SoCs that support devfreq device
drivers for Exynos4210/4212/4412.

The patches are:
ARM: EXYNOS4: Add DMC1, allow PPMU access for DMC.
ARM: EXYNOS4: Add clock register addresses for Exynos4x12 bus devfreq driver
ARM Exynos4210-Nuri: support Exynos4210-bus Devfreq driver.

Gitweb: http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/devfreq-for-samsung
Git Repository: git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung
Branch: devfreq-for-samsung

The following changes since commit 390f998509bf049019df0b078c0a6606e0d57fb4:

Merge: e34d6b4 6f6c2aa
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun Dec 18 14:28:31 2011 -0800

  Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc-fixes-2.6
(2011-12-18 14:28:31 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung.git devfreq-for-samsung

MyungJoo Ham (3):
      ARM: EXYNOS4: Add DMC1, allow PPMU access for DMC.
      ARM: EXYNOS4: Add clock register addresses for Exynos4x12 bus
devfreq driver
      ARM Exynos4210-Nuri: support Exynos4210-bus Devfreq driver.

 arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpu.c                     |    7 +++-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h        |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/regs-clock.h |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c               |   11 ++++--
 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Kukjin Kim - Dec. 24, 2011, 1:58 a.m.
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
Hi,

> Please pull the patches for Exynos4 SoCs that support devfreq device
> drivers for Exynos4210/4212/4412.
> 
> The patches are:
> ARM: EXYNOS4: Add DMC1, allow PPMU access for DMC.
> ARM: EXYNOS4: Add clock register addresses for Exynos4x12 bus devfreq
> driver
> ARM Exynos4210-Nuri: support Exynos4210-bus Devfreq driver.
> 
> Gitweb: http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-
> samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/devfreq-for-samsung
> Git Repository: git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung
> Branch: devfreq-for-samsung
> 
> The following changes since commit
> 390f998509bf049019df0b078c0a6606e0d57fb4:
> 
> Merge: e34d6b4 6f6c2aa
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date:   Sun Dec 18 14:28:31 2011 -0800
> 
>   Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc-fixes-
> 2.6
> (2011-12-18 14:28:31 -0800)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung.git devfreq-for-
> samsung
> 
> MyungJoo Ham (3):
>       ARM: EXYNOS4: Add DMC1, allow PPMU access for DMC.
>       ARM: EXYNOS4: Add clock register addresses for Exynos4x12 bus
> devfreq driver
>       ARM Exynos4210-Nuri: support Exynos4210-bus Devfreq driver.
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpu.c                     |    7 +++-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h        |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/regs-clock.h |   42
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c               |   11 ++++--
>  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> 
As I commented, looks ok to me and will apply patches not pull and since I
didn't get your answer to ask 'topic branch is required for this', I didn't
yet.

As a note, if there is no reason to create based on not -rc, just use -rc.

Merry Christmas.
Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
MyungJoo Ham - Dec. 26, 2011, 4:16 a.m.
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> As I commented, looks ok to me and will apply patches not pull and since I
> didn't get your answer to ask 'topic branch is required for this', I didn't
> yet.
>
> As a note, if there is no reason to create based on not -rc, just use -rc.
>
> Merry Christmas.
> Thanks.
>


Hello,

Having a topic branch for devfreq is fine and I don't care whether
there is one or not as long as the required registers are supported.

Because the registers added in the patches do not seem to be devfreq
specific, I don't think we should have another branch for this. Thus,
having the patches in your Exynos' branch is also fine.

I'll let future pull-requested branches be rebased on rcX anyway. Thanks.


Cheers! Happy new year!
- MyungJoo