diff mbox

Re: sam460ex, rtc-m41t80 incorrect behaviour with kernel >=linux-2.6.38

Message ID 1323730073.4078.97.camel@work-vm
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

John Stultz Dec. 12, 2011, 10:47 p.m. UTC
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 03:29 +0100, acrux_it@libero.it wrote:
> Acube Sam460ex is a 460ex SoC (PowerPC) based board with m41t81 like RTC.
> The wrong beahviour it seems to be caused this commit:
> 
> Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:02:35 +0000 (13:02 -0800)
> commit	16380c153a69c3784d2afaddfe0a22f353046cf6
> RTC: Convert rtc drivers to use the alarm_irq_enable method
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;
> h=16380c153a69c3784d2afaddfe0a22f353046cf6

Yea. This was reported earlier, but it seems none of the proposed
solutions have been implemented.

The cause is that the m41t80 driver's alarm functionality is somehow
broken. The alarm mode is actually now used for UIE, so where before
2.6.38, UIE mode returned -EINVAL, it will now succeed, setting the
alarm to fire a second away.

However, since the alarm code is broken, no alarm arrives and you get
the timeout you see.

Could you test the following patch to see if it resolves the issue for
you? If it does, I'll queue it for inclusion.

thanks
-john


[PATCH] rtc: m41t80: Workaround broken alarm functionality

The m41t80 driver doesn't seem to have a functional alarm.

This causes failures when the generic core sees alarm functions,
but then cannot use them properly for things like UIE mode.

Disabling the alarm functions allows proper error reporting,
and possible fallback to emulated modes. Once someone fixes
the alarm functions, this can be restored.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Comments

acrux Dec. 13, 2011, 8:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:47:53 -0800
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 03:29 +0100, acrux_it@libero.it wrote:
> > Acube Sam460ex is a 460ex SoC (PowerPC) based board with m41t81
> > like RTC. The wrong beahviour it seems to be caused this commit:
> > 
> > Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:02:35 +0000 (13:02 -0800)
> > commit	16380c153a69c3784d2afaddfe0a22f353046cf6
> > RTC: Convert rtc drivers to use the alarm_irq_enable method
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;
> > h=16380c153a69c3784d2afaddfe0a22f353046cf6
> 
> Yea. This was reported earlier, but it seems none of the proposed
> solutions have been implemented.
> 
> The cause is that the m41t80 driver's alarm functionality is somehow
> broken. The alarm mode is actually now used for UIE, so where before
> 2.6.38, UIE mode returned -EINVAL, it will now succeed, setting the
> alarm to fire a second away.
> 
> However, since the alarm code is broken, no alarm arrives and you get
> the timeout you see.
> 
> Could you test the following patch to see if it resolves the issue for
> you? If it does, I'll queue it for inclusion.
> 
> thanks
> -john
> 


hallo John,
CC to linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org


thanks for your time, this escamotage works fine.
I tested your patch against linux-2.6.38.8 and linux-3.1.5.

Tested-by: Nico Macrionitis <acrux@cruxppc.org>


cheers,
Nico



> 
> [PATCH] rtc: m41t80: Workaround broken alarm functionality
> 
> The m41t80 driver doesn't seem to have a functional alarm.
> 
> This causes failures when the generic core sees alarm functions,
> but then cannot use them properly for things like UIE mode.
> 
> Disabling the alarm functions allows proper error reporting,
> and possible fallback to emulated modes. Once someone fixes
> the alarm functions, this can be restored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c |    9 +++++++++
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
> index eda128f..64aedd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
> @@ -357,10 +357,19 @@ static int m41t80_rtc_read_alarm(struct device
> *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t) static struct rtc_class_ops
> m41t80_rtc_ops = { .read_time = m41t80_rtc_read_time,
>  	.set_time = m41t80_rtc_set_time,
> +	/*
> +	 * XXX - m41t80 alarm functionality is reported broken.
> +	 * until it is fixed, don't register alarm functions.
> +	 *
>  	.read_alarm = m41t80_rtc_read_alarm,
>  	.set_alarm = m41t80_rtc_set_alarm,
> +	*/
>  	.proc = m41t80_rtc_proc,
> +	/*
> +	 * See above comment on broken alarm
> +	 *
>  	.alarm_irq_enable = m41t80_rtc_alarm_irq_enable,
> +	*/
>  };
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS) || defined
>  #(CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS_MODULE)
> -- 
> 1.7.3.2.146.gca209
> 
> 
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
index eda128f..64aedd8 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
@@ -357,10 +357,19 @@  static int m41t80_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
 static struct rtc_class_ops m41t80_rtc_ops = {
 	.read_time = m41t80_rtc_read_time,
 	.set_time = m41t80_rtc_set_time,
+	/*
+	 * XXX - m41t80 alarm functionality is reported broken.
+	 * until it is fixed, don't register alarm functions.
+	 *
 	.read_alarm = m41t80_rtc_read_alarm,
 	.set_alarm = m41t80_rtc_set_alarm,
+	*/
 	.proc = m41t80_rtc_proc,
+	/*
+	 * See above comment on broken alarm
+	 *
 	.alarm_irq_enable = m41t80_rtc_alarm_irq_enable,
+	*/
 };
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS_MODULE)