Message ID | 20200330204059.13024-1-kpsingh@chromium.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | BPF Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next] bpf: lsm: Make BPF_LSM depend on BPF_EVENTS | expand |
On 3/30/20 10:40 PM, KP Singh wrote: > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> > > LSM and tracing programs share their helpers with bpf_tracing_func_proto > which is only defined (in bpf_trace.c) when BPF_EVENTS is enabled. > > Instead of adding __weak symbol, make BPF_LSM depend on > BPF_EVENTS so that both tracing and LSM programs can actually share > helpers. > > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Fixes: fc611f47f218 ("bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM") Applied, thanks!
On 3/30/20 2:00 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 3/30/20 10:40 PM, KP Singh wrote: >> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> >> >> LSM and tracing programs share their helpers with bpf_tracing_func_proto >> which is only defined (in bpf_trace.c) when BPF_EVENTS is enabled. >> >> Instead of adding __weak symbol, make BPF_LSM depend on >> BPF_EVENTS so that both tracing and LSM programs can actually share >> helpers. >> >> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> >> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >> Fixes: fc611f47f218 ("bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM") > > Applied, thanks! Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested thanks.
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index deae572d1927..7b7ea70e64ac 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -1619,6 +1619,7 @@ config KALLSYMS_BASE_RELATIVE config BPF_LSM bool "LSM Instrumentation with BPF" + depends on BPF_EVENTS depends on BPF_SYSCALL depends on SECURITY depends on BPF_JIT