From patchwork Tue Feb 11 03:38:29 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gustavo Luiz Duarte X-Patchwork-Id: 1236143 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48GpSZ4wlqz9s3x for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:40:14 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48GpSZ3nnszDqM3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:40:14 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=gustavold@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48GpQx01J0zDqCc for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:38:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01B3UTkQ110483; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:38:44 -0500 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2y1ufm0spk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:38:44 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 01B3aoVA018067; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:38:44 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.16]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2y1mm670jb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:38:43 +0000 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01B3cgFB49545666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:38:42 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8562AC6055; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:38:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ED1C605B; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:38:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moss.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.133.82]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:38:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Gustavo Luiz Duarte To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc/tm: Fix clearing MSR[TS] in current when reclaiming on signal delivery Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:38:29 -0300 Message-Id: <20200211033831.11165-1-gustavold@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-10_08:2020-02-10, 2020-02-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=794 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002110023 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mikey@neuling.org, Gustavo Luiz Duarte , stable@vger.kernel.org, gromero@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" After a treclaim, we expect to be in non-transactional state. If we don't clear the current thread's MSR[TS] before we get preempted, then tm_recheckpoint_new_task() will recheckpoint and we get rescheduled in suspended transaction state. When handling a signal caught in transactional state, handle_rt_signal64() calls get_tm_stackpointer() that treclaims the transaction using tm_reclaim_current() but without clearing the thread's MSR[TS]. This can cause the TM Bad Thing exception below if later we pagefault and get preempted trying to access the user's sigframe, using __put_user(). Afterwards, when we are rescheduled back into do_page_fault() (but now in suspended state since the thread's MSR[TS] was not cleared), upon executing 'rfid' after completion of the page fault handling, the exception is raised because a transition from suspended to non-transactional state is invalid. Unexpected TM Bad Thing exception at c00000000000de44 (msr 0x8000000302a03031) tm_scratch=800000010280b033 Oops: Unrecoverable exception, sig: 6 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables ip_tables nft_compat ip_set nf_tables nfnetlink xts vmx_crypto sg virtio_balloon r_mod cdrom virtio_net net_failover virtio_blk virtio_scsi failover dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod CPU: 25 PID: 15547 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.4.0-rc2 #32 NIP: c00000000000de44 LR: c000000000034728 CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c00000003fe7bd70 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.4.0-rc2) MSR: 8000000302a03031 CR: 44000884 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c00000000000dda4 IRQMASK: 0 PACATMSCRATCH: 800000010280b033 GPR00: c000000000034728 c000000f65a17c80 c000000001662800 00007fffacf3fd78 GPR04: 0000000000001000 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 c000000f611f8af0 GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000078006001 0000000000000000 000c000000000000 GPR12: c000000f611f84b0 c00000003ffcb200 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c000000f611f8140 GPR24: 0000000000000000 00007fffacf3fd68 c000000f65a17d90 c000000f611f7800 GPR28: c000000f65a17e90 c000000f65a17e90 c000000001685e18 00007fffacf3f000 NIP [c00000000000de44] fast_exception_return+0xf4/0x1b0 LR [c000000000034728] handle_rt_signal64+0x78/0xc50 Call Trace: [c000000f65a17c80] [c000000000034710] handle_rt_signal64+0x60/0xc50 (unreliable) [c000000f65a17d30] [c000000000023640] do_notify_resume+0x330/0x460 [c000000f65a17e20] [c00000000000dcc4] ret_from_except_lite+0x70/0x74 Instruction dump: 7c4ff120 e8410170 7c5a03a6 38400000 f8410060 e8010070 e8410080 e8610088 60000000 60000000 e8810090 e8210078 <4c000024> 48000000 e8610178 88ed0989 ---[ end trace 93094aa44b442f87 ]--- The simplified sequence of events that triggers the above exception is: ... # userspace in NON-TRANSACTIONAL state tbegin # userspace in TRANSACTIONAL state signal delivery # kernelspace in SUSPENDED state handle_rt_signal64() get_tm_stackpointer() treclaim # kernelspace in NON-TRANSACTIONAL state __put_user() page fault happens. We will never get back here because of the TM Bad Thing exception. page fault handling kicks in and we voluntarily preempt ourselves do_page_fault() __schedule() __switch_to(other_task) our task is rescheduled and we recheckpoint because the thread's MSR[TS] was not cleared __switch_to(our_task) switch_to_tm() tm_recheckpoint_new_task() trechkpt # kernelspace in SUSPENDED state The page fault handling resumes, but now we are in suspended transaction state do_page_fault() completes rfid <----- trying to get back where the page fault happened (we were non-transactional back then) TM Bad Thing # illegal transition from suspended to non-transactional This patch fixes that issue by clearing the current thread's MSR[TS] just after treclaim in get_tm_stackpointer() so that we stay in non-transactional state in case we are preempted. In order to make treclaim and clearing the thread's MSR[TS] atomic from a preemption perspective when CONFIG_PREEMPT is set, preempt_disable/enable() is used. It's also necessary to save the previous value of the thread's MSR before get_tm_stackpointer() is called so that it can be exposed to the signal handler later in setup_tm_sigcontexts() to inform the userspace MSR at the moment of the signal delivery. Found with tm-signal-context-force-tm kernel selftest. v3: Subject and comment improvements. v2: Fix build failure when tm is disabled. Fixes: 2b0a576d15e0 ("powerpc: Add new transactional memory state to the signal context") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.9 Signed-off-by: Gustavo Luiz Duarte Acked-By: Michael Neuling --- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c index e6c30cee6abf..76d99bc111dc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c @@ -200,14 +200,26 @@ unsigned long get_tm_stackpointer(struct task_struct *tsk) * normal/non-checkpointed stack pointer. */ + unsigned long ret = tsk->thread.regs->gpr[1]; + #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM BUG_ON(tsk != current); if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(tsk->thread.regs->msr)) { + preempt_disable(); tm_reclaim_current(TM_CAUSE_SIGNAL); if (MSR_TM_TRANSACTIONAL(tsk->thread.regs->msr)) - return tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.gpr[1]; + ret = tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.gpr[1]; + + /* If we treclaim, we must clear the current thread's TM bits + * before re-enabling preemption. Otherwise we might be + * preempted and have the live MSR[TS] changed behind our back + * (tm_recheckpoint_new_task() would recheckpoint). Besides, we + * enter the signal handler in non-transactional state. + */ + tsk->thread.regs->msr &= ~MSR_TS_MASK; + preempt_enable(); } #endif - return tsk->thread.regs->gpr[1]; + return ret; } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c index 98600b276f76..1b090a76b444 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c @@ -489,19 +489,11 @@ static int save_user_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext __user *frame, */ static int save_tm_user_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext __user *frame, - struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, int sigret) + struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, int sigret, + unsigned long msr) { - unsigned long msr = regs->msr; - WARN_ON(tm_suspend_disabled); - /* Remove TM bits from thread's MSR. The MSR in the sigcontext - * just indicates to userland that we were doing a transaction, but we - * don't want to return in transactional state. This also ensures - * that flush_fp_to_thread won't set TIF_RESTORE_TM again. - */ - regs->msr &= ~MSR_TS_MASK; - /* Save both sets of general registers */ if (save_general_regs(¤t->thread.ckpt_regs, frame) || save_general_regs(regs, tm_frame)) @@ -912,6 +904,10 @@ int handle_rt_signal32(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *oldset, int sigret; unsigned long tramp; struct pt_regs *regs = tsk->thread.regs; +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM + /* Save the thread's msr before get_tm_stackpointer() changes it */ + unsigned long msr = regs->msr; +#endif BUG_ON(tsk != current); @@ -944,13 +940,13 @@ int handle_rt_signal32(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *oldset, #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM tm_frame = &rt_sf->uc_transact.uc_mcontext; - if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(regs->msr)) { + if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr)) { if (__put_user((unsigned long)&rt_sf->uc_transact, &rt_sf->uc.uc_link) || __put_user((unsigned long)tm_frame, &rt_sf->uc_transact.uc_regs)) goto badframe; - if (save_tm_user_regs(regs, frame, tm_frame, sigret)) + if (save_tm_user_regs(regs, frame, tm_frame, sigret, msr)) goto badframe; } else @@ -1369,6 +1365,10 @@ int handle_signal32(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *oldset, int sigret; unsigned long tramp; struct pt_regs *regs = tsk->thread.regs; +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM + /* Save the thread's msr before get_tm_stackpointer() changes it */ + unsigned long msr = regs->msr; +#endif BUG_ON(tsk != current); @@ -1402,9 +1402,9 @@ int handle_signal32(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *oldset, #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM tm_mctx = &frame->mctx_transact; - if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(regs->msr)) { + if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr)) { if (save_tm_user_regs(regs, &frame->mctx, &frame->mctx_transact, - sigret)) + sigret, msr)) goto badframe; } else diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c index 117515564ec7..84ed2e77ef9c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c @@ -192,7 +192,8 @@ static long setup_sigcontext(struct sigcontext __user *sc, static long setup_tm_sigcontexts(struct sigcontext __user *sc, struct sigcontext __user *tm_sc, struct task_struct *tsk, - int signr, sigset_t *set, unsigned long handler) + int signr, sigset_t *set, unsigned long handler, + unsigned long msr) { /* When CONFIG_ALTIVEC is set, we _always_ setup v_regs even if the * process never used altivec yet (MSR_VEC is zero in pt_regs of @@ -207,12 +208,11 @@ static long setup_tm_sigcontexts(struct sigcontext __user *sc, elf_vrreg_t __user *tm_v_regs = sigcontext_vmx_regs(tm_sc); #endif struct pt_regs *regs = tsk->thread.regs; - unsigned long msr = tsk->thread.regs->msr; long err = 0; BUG_ON(tsk != current); - BUG_ON(!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(regs->msr)); + BUG_ON(!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr)); WARN_ON(tm_suspend_disabled); @@ -222,13 +222,6 @@ static long setup_tm_sigcontexts(struct sigcontext __user *sc, */ msr |= tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & (MSR_FP | MSR_VEC | MSR_VSX); - /* Remove TM bits from thread's MSR. The MSR in the sigcontext - * just indicates to userland that we were doing a transaction, but we - * don't want to return in transactional state. This also ensures - * that flush_fp_to_thread won't set TIF_RESTORE_TM again. - */ - regs->msr &= ~MSR_TS_MASK; - #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC err |= __put_user(v_regs, &sc->v_regs); err |= __put_user(tm_v_regs, &tm_sc->v_regs); @@ -824,6 +817,10 @@ int handle_rt_signal64(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set, unsigned long newsp = 0; long err = 0; struct pt_regs *regs = tsk->thread.regs; +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM + /* Save the thread's msr before get_tm_stackpointer() changes it */ + unsigned long msr = regs->msr; +#endif BUG_ON(tsk != current); @@ -841,7 +838,7 @@ int handle_rt_signal64(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set, err |= __put_user(0, &frame->uc.uc_flags); err |= __save_altstack(&frame->uc.uc_stack, regs->gpr[1]); #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM - if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(regs->msr)) { + if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr)) { /* The ucontext_t passed to userland points to the second * ucontext_t (for transactional state) with its uc_link ptr. */ @@ -849,7 +846,8 @@ int handle_rt_signal64(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set, err |= setup_tm_sigcontexts(&frame->uc.uc_mcontext, &frame->uc_transact.uc_mcontext, tsk, ksig->sig, NULL, - (unsigned long)ksig->ka.sa.sa_handler); + (unsigned long)ksig->ka.sa.sa_handler, + msr); } else #endif {