Patchwork Fix NULL dereference in x25_recvmsg

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Dave Jones
Date Nov. 2, 2011, 1:53 a.m.
Message ID <20111102015315.GA6569@redhat.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/123198/
State Superseded
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Comments

Dave Jones - Nov. 2, 2011, 1:53 a.m.
commit cb101ed2 in 3.0 introduced a bug in x25_recvmsg()
When passed bogus junk from userspace, x25->neighbour can be NULL,
as shown in this oops..

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c
IP: [<ffffffffa05482bd>] x25_recvmsg+0x4d/0x280 [x25]
PGD 1015f3067 PUD 105072067 PMD 0 
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
CPU 0 
Pid: 27928, comm: iknowthis Not tainted 3.1.0+ #2 Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA78GM-S2H/GA-MA78GM-S2H
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa05482bd>]  [<ffffffffa05482bd>] x25_recvmsg+0x4d/0x280 [x25]
RSP: 0018:ffff88010c0b7cc8  EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88010c0b7d78 RCX: 0000000000000c02
RDX: ffff88010c0b7d78 RSI: ffff88011c93dc00 RDI: ffff880103f667b0
RBP: ffff88010c0b7d18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880103f667b0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00007f479ce7f700(0000) GS:ffff88012a600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 000000010529e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process iknowthis (pid: 27928, threadinfo ffff88010c0b6000, task ffff880103faa4f0)
Stack:
 0000000000000c02 0000000000000c02 ffff88010c0b7d18 ffffff958153cb37
 ffffffff8153cb60 0000000000000c02 ffff88011c93dc00 0000000000000000
 0000000000000c02 ffff88010c0b7e10 ffff88010c0b7de8 ffffffff815372c2
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8153cb60>] ? sock_update_classid+0xb0/0x180
 [<ffffffff815372c2>] sock_aio_read.part.10+0x142/0x150
 [<ffffffff812d6752>] ? inode_has_perm+0x62/0xa0
 [<ffffffff815372fd>] sock_aio_read+0x2d/0x40
 [<ffffffff811b05e2>] do_sync_read+0xd2/0x110
 [<ffffffff812d3796>] ? security_file_permission+0x96/0xb0
 [<ffffffff811b0a91>] ? rw_verify_area+0x61/0x100
 [<ffffffff811b103d>] vfs_read+0x16d/0x180
 [<ffffffff811b109d>] sys_read+0x4d/0x90
 [<ffffffff81657282>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Code: 8b 66 20 4c 8b 32 48 89 d3 48 89 4d b8 45 89 c7 c7 45 cc 95 ff ff ff 4d 85 e4 0f 84 ed 01 00 00 49 8b 84 24 18 05 00 00 4c 89 e7 
 78 1c 01 45 19 ed 31 f6 e8 d5 37 ff e0 41 0f b6 44 24 0e 41 

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Eric Dumazet - Nov. 2, 2011, 2:10 a.m.
Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 21:53 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
> commit cb101ed2 in 3.0 introduced a bug in x25_recvmsg()
> When passed bogus junk from userspace, x25->neighbour can be NULL,
> as shown in this oops..
> 

Your patch seems fine but :

Are you sure this bug is not present on previous kernels ?

It seems we had prior to this commit :

skb_pull(skb, x25->neighbour->extended ?
	X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN);



> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
> index 5f03e4e..291b2e0 100644
> --- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
> +++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
> @@ -1261,13 +1261,17 @@ static int x25_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
>  	struct x25_sock *x25 = x25_sk(sk);
>  	struct sockaddr_x25 *sx25 = (struct sockaddr_x25 *)msg->msg_name;
>  	size_t copied;
> -	int qbit, header_len = x25->neighbour->extended ?
> -		X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN;
> -
> +	int qbit, header_len;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	unsigned char *asmptr;
>  	int rc = -ENOTCONN;
>  
> +	if (x25->neighbour == NULL)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	header_len = x25->neighbour->extended ?
> +		X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN;
> +
>  	lock_sock(sk);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Dave Jones - Nov. 2, 2011, 2:15 a.m.
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:10:45AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
 > Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 21:53 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
 > > commit cb101ed2 in 3.0 introduced a bug in x25_recvmsg()
 > > When passed bogus junk from userspace, x25->neighbour can be NULL,
 > > as shown in this oops..
 > > 
 > 
 > Your patch seems fine but :
 > 
 > Are you sure this bug is not present on previous kernels ?
 > 
 > It seems we had prior to this commit :
 > 
 > skb_pull(skb, x25->neighbour->extended ?
 > 	X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN);

It might have been possible with a specifically crafted set of arguments.

It never showed up in testing before now, probably because we were
returning from the function before we got to that skb_pull
via all the other tests that get performed.

	Dave


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Eric Dumazet - Nov. 2, 2011, 2:16 a.m.
Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 21:53 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
> commit cb101ed2 in 3.0 introduced a bug in x25_recvmsg()
> When passed bogus junk from userspace, x25->neighbour can be NULL,
> as shown in this oops..
> 
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c
> IP: [<ffffffffa05482bd>] x25_recvmsg+0x4d/0x280 [x25]
> PGD 1015f3067 PUD 105072067 PMD 0 
> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> CPU 0 
> Pid: 27928, comm: iknowthis Not tainted 3.1.0+ #2 Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA78GM-S2H/GA-MA78GM-S2H
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa05482bd>]  [<ffffffffa05482bd>] x25_recvmsg+0x4d/0x280 [x25]
> RSP: 0018:ffff88010c0b7cc8  EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88010c0b7d78 RCX: 0000000000000c02
> RDX: ffff88010c0b7d78 RSI: ffff88011c93dc00 RDI: ffff880103f667b0
> RBP: ffff88010c0b7d18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880103f667b0
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS:  00007f479ce7f700(0000) GS:ffff88012a600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 000000010529e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process iknowthis (pid: 27928, threadinfo ffff88010c0b6000, task ffff880103faa4f0)
> Stack:
>  0000000000000c02 0000000000000c02 ffff88010c0b7d18 ffffff958153cb37
>  ffffffff8153cb60 0000000000000c02 ffff88011c93dc00 0000000000000000
>  0000000000000c02 ffff88010c0b7e10 ffff88010c0b7de8 ffffffff815372c2
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8153cb60>] ? sock_update_classid+0xb0/0x180
>  [<ffffffff815372c2>] sock_aio_read.part.10+0x142/0x150
>  [<ffffffff812d6752>] ? inode_has_perm+0x62/0xa0
>  [<ffffffff815372fd>] sock_aio_read+0x2d/0x40
>  [<ffffffff811b05e2>] do_sync_read+0xd2/0x110
>  [<ffffffff812d3796>] ? security_file_permission+0x96/0xb0
>  [<ffffffff811b0a91>] ? rw_verify_area+0x61/0x100
>  [<ffffffff811b103d>] vfs_read+0x16d/0x180
>  [<ffffffff811b109d>] sys_read+0x4d/0x90
>  [<ffffffff81657282>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Code: 8b 66 20 4c 8b 32 48 89 d3 48 89 4d b8 45 89 c7 c7 45 cc 95 ff ff ff 4d 85 e4 0f 84 ed 01 00 00 49 8b 84 24 18 05 00 00 4c 89 e7 
>  78 1c 01 45 19 ed 31 f6 e8 d5 37 ff e0 41 0f b6 44 24 0e 41 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
> index 5f03e4e..291b2e0 100644
> --- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
> +++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
> @@ -1261,13 +1261,17 @@ static int x25_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
>  	struct x25_sock *x25 = x25_sk(sk);
>  	struct sockaddr_x25 *sx25 = (struct sockaddr_x25 *)msg->msg_name;
>  	size_t copied;
> -	int qbit, header_len = x25->neighbour->extended ?
> -		X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN;
> -
> +	int qbit, header_len;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	unsigned char *asmptr;
>  	int rc = -ENOTCONN;
>  
> +	if (x25->neighbour == NULL)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	header_len = x25->neighbour->extended ?
> +		X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN;
> +
>  	lock_sock(sk);

BTW, you probably want to check x25->neighbour while sk is locked, not
before.

	lock_sock(sk);
	if (x25->neighbour == NULL)
		goto out;
	header_len = x25->neighbour->extended ?
		     X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN;
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Eric Dumazet - Nov. 2, 2011, 2:19 a.m.
Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 22:15 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:10:45AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>  > Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 21:53 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
>  > > commit cb101ed2 in 3.0 introduced a bug in x25_recvmsg()
>  > > When passed bogus junk from userspace, x25->neighbour can be NULL,
>  > > as shown in this oops..
>  > > 
>  > 
>  > Your patch seems fine but :
>  > 
>  > Are you sure this bug is not present on previous kernels ?
>  > 
>  > It seems we had prior to this commit :
>  > 
>  > skb_pull(skb, x25->neighbour->extended ?
>  > 	X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN);
> 
> It might have been possible with a specifically crafted set of arguments.
> 
> It never showed up in testing before now, probably because we were
> returning from the function before we got to that skb_pull
> via all the other tests that get performed.
> 

neighbour is not an x25_recvmsg() argument, but related to x25 socket
state.

Maybe your tests dont try to use x25_recvmsg() while socket has no
neighbour...

This bug was there before the cb101ed2 commit.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Eric Dumazet - Nov. 2, 2011, 2:21 a.m.
Le mercredi 02 novembre 2011 à 03:19 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 22:15 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:10:45AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >  > Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 21:53 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
> >  > > commit cb101ed2 in 3.0 introduced a bug in x25_recvmsg()
> >  > > When passed bogus junk from userspace, x25->neighbour can be NULL,
> >  > > as shown in this oops..
> >  > > 
> >  > 
> >  > Your patch seems fine but :
> >  > 
> >  > Are you sure this bug is not present on previous kernels ?
> >  > 
> >  > It seems we had prior to this commit :
> >  > 
> >  > skb_pull(skb, x25->neighbour->extended ?
> >  > 	X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN);
> > 
> > It might have been possible with a specifically crafted set of arguments.
> > 
> > It never showed up in testing before now, probably because we were
> > returning from the function before we got to that skb_pull
> > via all the other tests that get performed.
> > 
> 
> neighbour is not an x25_recvmsg() argument, but related to x25 socket
> state.
> 
> Maybe your tests dont try to use x25_recvmsg() while socket has no
> neighbour...
> 
> This bug was there before the cb101ed2 commit.
> 

Ah ok, I see now, we exited early because of 

if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED)
	goto out;

So yes, commit cb101ed2 is the bug origin, sorry for the noise.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index 5f03e4e..291b2e0 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
+++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
@@ -1261,13 +1261,17 @@  static int x25_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
 	struct x25_sock *x25 = x25_sk(sk);
 	struct sockaddr_x25 *sx25 = (struct sockaddr_x25 *)msg->msg_name;
 	size_t copied;
-	int qbit, header_len = x25->neighbour->extended ?
-		X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN;
-
+	int qbit, header_len;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned char *asmptr;
 	int rc = -ENOTCONN;
 
+	if (x25->neighbour == NULL)
+		return rc;
+
+	header_len = x25->neighbour->extended ?
+		X25_EXT_MIN_LEN : X25_STD_MIN_LEN;
+
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	/*
 	 * This works for seqpacket too. The receiver has ordered the queue for