From patchwork Fri Dec 13 08:30:47 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrew Pinski X-Patchwork-Id: 1209001 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-515845-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="o1CjbdKX"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="UKi4P9gg"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47Z3mZ1cg6z9sNH for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 19:31:42 +1100 (AEDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q= dns; s=default; b=ByX2NyxqhuStHsUJf7j7B1mN5M2CTUK0zsUoEM1smNDb/y mdBQMlidFpK4FeZm31NIXhxRhEOr/5/mJcySY3kBmaSfHFaojrkZoI9BJafBagNS U/9a6tb6zTl2I4qe1vJZrATCH8i4bRht4SDDp55OxgDzo3TUqxYJq4fkW8XeA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s= default; bh=Iy8aqaBQ/+orLlLRn5pqvsoFG8o=; b=o1CjbdKXQwcKa89RrUvT pU1c4Lfs0bmKWefqIn+lAc3YT8EZ2Cj0vVk7/Y5CXKQWU/quQW040M/9iQ1kSeV6 BERCUxqwUqriq7TmyJSSO8NWJrwAHU5sodxTcNiN3u3/Cn1MltWczMEv7tOJ9qbs NG9K+tiM5L+DLp9aom9pBuA= Received: (qmail 103409 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2019 08:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103225 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2019 08:31:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=customer X-HELO: mail-vs1-f41.google.com Received: from mail-vs1-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vs1-f41.google.com) (209.85.217.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 08:31:00 +0000 Received: by mail-vs1-f41.google.com with SMTP id x18so992357vsq.4 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:31:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9yaPG5sq+VIaIxcEk/cRkkd/gHT2pJAKuR/uhBJlkW0=; b=UKi4P9ggVIKSS9DF99QBplFyR81AYt6He7Xb8l3ko3D/E4vCas9aZAB/Kc1KLQQHNC sjsnIIzZpkMntVq0q/S8tXqvldcjcgUZcKnfDxpRk+w8JQq7VBEbLQ343KEUXqkEIymN 5Zx0+8TEpY8A+6EbRtJup0qm5yxu2Z1/pZZHfZYr+1UHdPgs5NxvwpAbvMPuMLVDX9gi ekJi2H/W952OINhJEKAijSKFAJfp7A6SRP47bFRuFhwSI8OcvLHRWAl1Vzpdn9v2rtNr ZAyElxAev+HXEQEQhOJ1axuKOt//ZvWazWEi2giKKVnBRpoVPVP1Z9e85Ni+HNZ0CNDm IwZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andrew Pinski Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:30:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [Committed] Add C testcases for PR 86659 To: GCC Patches X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi all, Since Ada is not always tested and I had received a testcase from a customer for the same issue (I had backported the patch which caused it), I thought I would create a full testcase that fails with C code. NOTE this does not fail on x86_64 (nor aarch64) before the patch for PR86659 due to SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS set to 0. But I changed SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS to be 1 when I was testing the code. Committed as obvious after a simple test. Thanks, Andrew Pinski testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-12-13 Andrew Pinski * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-1.c: New test. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-2.c: New test. Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== --- ChangeLog (revision 279337) +++ ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2019-12-13 Andrew Pinski + + * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-1.c: New test. + * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-2.c: New test. + 2019-12-12 Jakub Jelinek PR target/92904 Index: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-1.c =================================================================== --- gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-1.c (nonexistent) +++ gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-1.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +#define ENDIANBIG __attribute((scalar_storage_order ("big-endian"))) + +typedef struct ENDIANBIG +{ + unsigned long long field0:29; + unsigned long long field1:4; + unsigned long long field2:31; +}struct1; + +int +main(void) +{ + int value1 = 0; + int value2 = 0; + int value3 = 0; + unsigned int flag; + struct1 var1; + var1.field0 = 23; + + flag = var1.field0; + value1 = ((var1.field0)?10:20); + if(var1.field0) + { + value2 = 10; + } else + { + value2 = 20; + } + + value3 = ((flag)?10:20); + + if (value1 != 10) + __builtin_abort (); + + if (value2 != 10) + __builtin_abort (); + + if (value3 != 10) + __builtin_abort (); + + return 0; +} Index: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-2.c =================================================================== --- gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-2.c (nonexistent) +++ gcc.c-torture/execute/pr86659-2.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +#define ENDIANBIG __attribute((scalar_storage_order ("little-endian"))) + +typedef struct ENDIANBIG +{ + unsigned long long field0:29; + unsigned long long field1:4; + unsigned long long field2:31; +}struct1; + +int +main(void) +{ + int value1 = 0; + int value2 = 0; + int value3 = 0; + unsigned int flag; + struct1 var1; + var1.field0 = 23; + + flag = var1.field0; + value1 = ((var1.field0)?10:20); + if(var1.field0) + { + value2 = 10; + } else + { + value2 = 20; + } + + value3 = ((flag)?10:20); + + if (value1 != 10) + __builtin_abort (); + + if (value2 != 10) + __builtin_abort (); + + if (value3 != 10) + __builtin_abort (); + + return 0; +}