From patchwork Tue Dec 10 09:03:34 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jakub Jelinek X-Patchwork-Id: 1206983 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-515579-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="TqWtwB1F"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ddH1DBdJ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47XDd4674tz9sPh for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 20:03:52 +1100 (AEDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=jX4 7JCz73Ji9d8HvUHkf8wubdJAQxr3nRKd939jFSxq2nG7kSChbXFkC2QYs/VySvEt L6xbzuvUePaEVF/Q/SCCVx5D3cjz0q/GbgSXJksr+mgypFjaHbKsAQzxFmLrKz/F Cqpaz+pj7X0ypDviWEuOpcvWP7yvkoakJQtqCIzE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=8BHrUD2uj jKVHUa6k11zZ9y0jT0=; b=TqWtwB1FrjAHySChRQcP9Px7W8K0a89KQcmqE/kp4 tm1fzcAS2UJgpNSMSxfDsequCU8FMCFMgqHZwnFgmuhTY2ICcgfaj8ej1rQs7Xou zympShK6qqixwv8YKlwDZ0TXDWdug52ThXg1dkCKUmo4k0z4XV8sLRXEOp2lZb11 DE= Received: (qmail 63310 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2019 09:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 63301 invoked by uid 89); 10 Dec 2019 09:03:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:03:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575968622; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WYHLNYQ9Fh4I/j0pg09nmWMcvRvYvwGFlUol+nwGrWM=; b=ddH1DBdJIztc1/MwpvSjBGL1qD/9NcHil8uIMeV+xnutH2tv4MGMEFdNQslQsgH4+gb4pY 6StYvbuNnpnCqZK1x6vJL5VX/SQxm1Ct2Idv5Xhsi+n3H69XSEGZIx658kWk69L+Em29Yn uwBIC//QSWfinfU/m9HKTFqhUl9xOec= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-142-gDDyHhZwM9uvQwrK45VETQ-1; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:03:39 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1926100551C; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-117-59.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.59]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A13D5C21A; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBA93aTa001634; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:03:36 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBA93YK6001633; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:03:34 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:03:34 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Uros Bizjak Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [committed] Fix some i386.c comment typos Message-ID: <20191210090334.GV10088@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi! Last night when working on -fstack-protector* improvement to be posted, I've noticed a few typos. Fixed thusly, committed to trunk as obvious. 2019-12-10 Jakub Jelinek * config/i386/i386.c (IX86_LEA_PRIORITY): Fix comment typos. Jakub --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj 2019-12-09 11:12:30.083287310 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2019-12-09 18:09:45.162155616 +0100 @@ -14411,10 +14411,10 @@ distance_agu_use (unsigned int regno0, r } /* Define this macro to tune LEA priority vs ADD, it take effect when - there is a dilemma of choicing LEA or ADD + there is a dilemma of choosing LEA or ADD Negative value: ADD is more preferred than LEA - Zero: Netrual - Positive value: LEA is more preferred than ADD*/ + Zero: Neutral + Positive value: LEA is more preferred than ADD. */ #define IX86_LEA_PRIORITY 0 /* Return true if usage of lea INSN has performance advantage