[v2,15/24] pinctrl: lynxpoint: Move ownership check to IRQ chip
diff mbox series

Message ID 20191209130926.86483-16-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
State New
Headers show
Series
  • pinctrl: intel: Move Lynxpoint to pin control umbrella
Related show

Commit Message

Andy Shevchenko Dec. 9, 2019, 1:09 p.m. UTC
There is nothing wrong with requesting pin that owned by ACPI.
The only difference is how interrupt status will be reflected.
It means that in ACPI mode we may not use pin as GPIO-backed IRQ.

Taking above into consideration, move the check from GPIO to IRQ chip
callback.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c
index 19e8f8f1f7aa..ddb201e5d78f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-lynxpoint.c
@@ -118,12 +118,6 @@  static int lp_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
 
 	pm_runtime_get(lg->dev); /* should we put if failed */
 
-	/* Fail if BIOS reserved pin for ACPI use */
-	if (lp_gpio_acpi_use(lg, offset)) {
-		dev_err(lg->dev, "gpio %d reserved for ACPI\n", offset);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Reconfigure pin to GPIO mode if needed and issue a warning,
 	 * since we expect firmware to configure it properly.
@@ -280,6 +274,12 @@  static int lp_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 	if (hwirq >= lg->chip.ngpio)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Fail if BIOS reserved pin for ACPI use */
+	if (lp_gpio_acpi_use(lg, hwirq)) {
+		dev_err(lg->dev, "pin %u can't be used as IRQ\n", hwirq);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lg->lock, flags);
 	value = ioread32(reg);