| Message ID | 20191120174357.26112-1-cgzones@googlemail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Pablo Neira |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [RFC,1/4] statement: make secmark statements idempotent | expand |
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:43:54PM +0100, Christian Göttsche wrote: > Currently lines like > > ct state new meta secmark set tcp dport map @secmapping_in > > become > > ct state new secmark name tcp dport map @secmapping_in Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/src/statement.c b/src/statement.c index af84e06c..be35bcef 100644 --- a/src/statement.c +++ b/src/statement.c @@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ static void objref_stmt_print(const struct stmt *stmt, struct output_ctx *octx) case NFT_OBJECT_CT_EXPECT: nft_print(octx, "ct expectation set "); break; + case NFT_OBJECT_SECMARK: + nft_print(octx, "meta secmark set "); + break; default: nft_print(octx, "%s name ", objref_type_name(stmt->objref.type));
Currently lines like ct state new meta secmark set tcp dport map @secmapping_in become ct state new secmark name tcp dport map @secmapping_in fixes: 3bc84e5c1fdd1ff011af9788fe174e0514c2c9ea Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> --- src/statement.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)