Message ID | 20191116002003.13013-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Petr Vorel |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/1] fanotify: Fix for musl | expand |
----- Original Message ----- > FSID_VAL_MEMBER() wrapper was meant to be only for struct > fanotify_event_info_fid, it was used also for struct event_t > (which has also __kernel_fsid_t fsid, but shouldn't be redefined). > > This caused error on recent musl v1.1.23 (with f67b3c17), > which has struct fanotify_event_info_fid. > > Fixes: 0498fc0a8 ("fanotify: Detect val vs. __val > fanotify_event_info_fid.fsid member") > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> If it's needed for __kernel_fsid_t we'll need to come up with better names. This basically reverts part of previous patch, which looks ok to me. Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Hi Jan, > ----- Original Message ----- > > FSID_VAL_MEMBER() wrapper was meant to be only for struct > > fanotify_event_info_fid, it was used also for struct event_t > > (which has also __kernel_fsid_t fsid, but shouldn't be redefined). > > This caused error on recent musl v1.1.23 (with f67b3c17), > > which has struct fanotify_event_info_fid. > > Fixes: 0498fc0a8 ("fanotify: Detect val vs. __val > > fanotify_event_info_fid.fsid member") > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> > If it's needed for __kernel_fsid_t we'll need to come up with better names. +1. But hope this is not needed. > This basically reverts part of previous patch, which looks ok to me. Yep. I'll add this to commit message, to be obvious. > Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Thanks for your review. I'll wait with merge till Monday (if Cyril has some comments). Kind regards, Petr
Hi, > > If it's needed for __kernel_fsid_t we'll need to come up with better names. > +1. But hope this is not needed. > > This basically reverts part of previous patch, which looks ok to me. > Yep. I'll add this to commit message, to be obvious. > > Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> > Thanks for your review. > I'll wait with merge till Monday (if Cyril has some comments). Merged. Kind regards, Petr
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h index 5370e30bb..9c98aaa1d 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct fanotify_event_info_fid { }; #endif /* HAVE_STRUCT_FANOTIFY_EVENT_INFO_FID */ +/* NOTE: only for struct fanotify_event_info_fid */ #ifdef HAVE_STRUCT_FANOTIFY_EVENT_INFO_FID_FSID___VAL # define FSID_VAL_MEMBER(fsid, i) (fsid.__val[i]) #else diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify13.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify13.c index 26212ab62..3d8de6009 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify13.c +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify13.c @@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ static int setup_marks(unsigned int fd, struct test_case_t *tc) "kernel"); return 1; } else if (errno == ENODEV && - !FSID_VAL_MEMBER(event_set[i].fsid, 0) && - !FSID_VAL_MEMBER(event_set[i].fsid, 1)) { + !event_set[i].fsid.val[0] && + !event_set[i].fsid.val[1]) { tst_res(TCONF, "FAN_REPORT_FID not supported on " "filesystem type %s",
FSID_VAL_MEMBER() wrapper was meant to be only for struct fanotify_event_info_fid, it was used also for struct event_t (which has also __kernel_fsid_t fsid, but shouldn't be redefined). This caused error on recent musl v1.1.23 (with f67b3c17), which has struct fanotify_event_info_fid. Fixes: 0498fc0a8 ("fanotify: Detect val vs. __val fanotify_event_info_fid.fsid member") Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> --- Hi, I'm sorry, one more error sneaked in. I accidentally tested it on toolchains which has older musl release. Helper should have obvious name to show it's just for fanotify_event_info_fid, but something like EVENT_INFO_FID_FSID_VAL_MEMBER() is too long. Posting just in case you prefer renaming (fanotify.h is getting a bit complicated). NOTE: I also find in various uclibc arch dependent kernel_types.h headers libc/sysdeps/linux/x86_64/bits/kernel_types.h (19 of 29 archs) typedef struct { #ifdef __USE_ALL int val[2]; #else int __val[2]; #endif } __kernel_fsid_t; which would suggest we need also detection and helper for general __kernel_fsid_t usage. But I'd ignore it unless anybody reports it's really needed. I haven't found whether __USE_ALL is set as default, but I expect it so. Kind regards, Petr testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h | 1 + testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify13.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)