From patchwork Fri Nov 8 13:02:13 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yue Haibing X-Patchwork-Id: 1192011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478lDQ4VWMz9sNx for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 02:53:26 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478lDN4sT9zF4T2 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 02:53:24 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.35; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=yuehaibing@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478gRW589xzF6qp for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 00:02:44 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id CD6587B9FF91A25B08F4; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 21:02:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.133.213.239) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 21:02:25 +0800 From: YueHaibing To: , Subject: [PATCH -next] soc: fsl: Enable COMPILE_TEST Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 21:02:13 +0800 Message-ID: <20191108130213.23684-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.2.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.133.213.239] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: YueHaibing , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" When do COMPILE_TEST buiding for RTC_DRV_FSL_FTM_ALARM, we get this warning: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FSL_RCPM Depends on [n]: PM_SLEEP [=y] && (ARM || ARM64) Selected by [m]: - RTC_DRV_FSL_FTM_ALARM [=m] && RTC_CLASS [=y] && (ARCH_LAYERSCAPE || SOC_LS1021A || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) This enable COMPILE_TEST for FSL_RCPM to fix the issue. Fixes: e1c2feb1efa2 ("rtc: fsl-ftm-alarm: allow COMPILE_TEST") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing --- In commit c6c2d36bc46f ("rtc: fsl-ftm-alarm: Fix build error without PM_SLEEP") I posted a wrong kconfig warning(which PM_SLEEP is n), sorry for confusion. --- drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig index 4df32bc..e142662 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ config DPAA2_CONSOLE config FSL_RCPM bool "Freescale RCPM support" - depends on PM_SLEEP && (ARM || ARM64) + depends on PM_SLEEP && (ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST) help The NXP QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module (Run Control and Power Management), which performs all device-level