@@ -374,17 +374,17 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_parselist_user(void)
__test_bitmap_parselist(1);
}
-#define EXP_BYTES (sizeof(exp) * 8)
+#define EXP1_IN_BITS (sizeof(exp) * 8)
static void __init test_bitmap_arr32(void)
{
unsigned int nbits, next_bit;
- u32 arr[sizeof(exp) / 4];
- DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap2, EXP_BYTES);
+ u32 arr[EXP1_IN_BITS / 32];
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap2, EXP1_IN_BITS);
memset(arr, 0xa5, sizeof(arr));
- for (nbits = 0; nbits < EXP_BYTES; ++nbits) {
+ for (nbits = 0; nbits < EXP1_IN_BITS; ++nbits) {
bitmap_to_arr32(arr, exp, nbits);
bitmap_from_arr32(bmap2, arr, nbits);
expect_eq_bitmap(bmap2, exp, nbits);
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_arr32(void)
" tail is not safely cleared: %d\n",
nbits, next_bit);
- if (nbits < EXP_BYTES - 32)
+ if (nbits < EXP1_IN_BITS - 32)
expect_eq_uint(arr[DIV_ROUND_UP(nbits, 32)],
0xa5a5a5a5);
}
EXP_BYTES has been wrongly named. It's a size of the exp array in bits. While here, go ahead and rename to EXP1_IN_BITS to avoid double renaming when exp will be renamed to exp1 in the next patch Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- lib/test_bitmap.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)