Message ID | 1316526315-16801-5-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:45:15PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Tell the page allocator that pages allocated for a buffered write are > expected to become dirty soon. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c > index e7872e4..ea1b892 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c > @@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static noinline int prepare_pages(struct btrfs_root *root, struct file *file, > again: > for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) { > pages[i] = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index + i, > - GFP_NOFS); > + GFP_NOFS | __GFP_WRITE); Btw and unrelated to this particular series, I think this should use grab_cache_page_write_begin() in the first place. Most grab_cache_page calls were replaced recently (a94733d "Btrfs: use find_or_create_page instead of grab_cache_page") to be able to pass GFP_NOFS, but the pages are now also no longer __GFP_HIGHMEM and __GFP_MOVABLE, which irks both x86_32 and memory hotplug. It might be better to change grab_cache_page instead to take a flags argument that allows passing AOP_FLAG_NOFS and revert the sites back to this helper? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 09/20/2011 09:56 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:45:15PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> Tell the page allocator that pages allocated for a buffered write are >> expected to become dirty soon. >> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> >> --- >> fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c >> index e7872e4..ea1b892 100644 >> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c >> @@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static noinline int prepare_pages(struct btrfs_root *root, struct file *file, >> again: >> for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) { >> pages[i] = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index + i, >> - GFP_NOFS); >> + GFP_NOFS | __GFP_WRITE); > > Btw and unrelated to this particular series, I think this should use > grab_cache_page_write_begin() in the first place. > > Most grab_cache_page calls were replaced recently (a94733d "Btrfs: use > find_or_create_page instead of grab_cache_page") to be able to pass > GFP_NOFS, but the pages are now also no longer __GFP_HIGHMEM and > __GFP_MOVABLE, which irks both x86_32 and memory hotplug. > > It might be better to change grab_cache_page instead to take a flags > argument that allows passing AOP_FLAG_NOFS and revert the sites back > to this helper? So I can do pages[i] = grab_cache_page_write_begin(inode->i_mapping, index + i, AOP_FLAG_NOFS); right? All we need is nofs, so I can just go through and change everybody to that. I'd rather not have to go through and change grab_cache_page() to take a flags argument and change all the callers, I have a bad habit of screwing stuff like that up :). Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:09:38AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > On 09/20/2011 09:56 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:45:15PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > >> Tell the page allocator that pages allocated for a buffered write are > >> expected to become dirty soon. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +- > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c > >> index e7872e4..ea1b892 100644 > >> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c > >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c > >> @@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static noinline int prepare_pages(struct btrfs_root *root, struct file *file, > >> again: > >> for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) { > >> pages[i] = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index + i, > >> - GFP_NOFS); > >> + GFP_NOFS | __GFP_WRITE); > > > > Btw and unrelated to this particular series, I think this should use > > grab_cache_page_write_begin() in the first place. > > > > Most grab_cache_page calls were replaced recently (a94733d "Btrfs: use > > find_or_create_page instead of grab_cache_page") to be able to pass > > GFP_NOFS, but the pages are now also no longer __GFP_HIGHMEM and > > __GFP_MOVABLE, which irks both x86_32 and memory hotplug. > > > > It might be better to change grab_cache_page instead to take a flags > > argument that allows passing AOP_FLAG_NOFS and revert the sites back > > to this helper? > > So I can do > > pages[i] = grab_cache_page_write_begin(inode->i_mapping, index + i, > AOP_FLAG_NOFS); > > right? All we need is nofs, so I can just go through and change > everybody to that. It does wait_on_page_writeback() in addition, so it may not be appropriate for every callsite, I haven't checked. But everything that grabs a page for writing should be fine if you do it like this. > I'd rather not have to go through and change grab_cache_page() to > take a flags argument and change all the callers, I have a bad habit > of screwing stuff like that up :). Yeah, there are quite a few. If we can get around it, all the better. Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 09/20/2011 09:45 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Tell the page allocator that pages allocated for a buffered write are > expected to become dirty soon. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner<jweiner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index e7872e4..ea1b892 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static noinline int prepare_pages(struct btrfs_root *root, struct file *file, again: for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) { pages[i] = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index + i, - GFP_NOFS); + GFP_NOFS | __GFP_WRITE); if (!pages[i]) { faili = i - 1; err = -ENOMEM;
Tell the page allocator that pages allocated for a buffered write are expected to become dirty soon. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)