From patchwork Sat Aug 24 01:34:08 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Brendan Higgins X-Patchwork-Id: 1152535 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="haAur+si"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="ggw9j6YN"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Fgms1shSz9sN1 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 11:34:53 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:From:Subject:References:Mime-Version :Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=kVvHdQlRHG+0K5/SXPk4hfdmxRYP55d4/toaSQcNkDU=; b=haAur+si9IUY6S yBfLAMjRTRfx80JDAHsU/tARF6ZbrmWva8k5pRL/AbfoAkOwuM71qbYJmlREP/F5MTh+ql7x7Zj9D rby0y21cmi5MaWoue9KVjRsetAl88K8CiWkawMCQWNyWFtyFOtgP39zuQNAkq8lrNw8ggALi8xbRM zOgsPu5Sv+fuEk/NTsOEP/GNxwAJUlbUlC8e5gz+gQ6a0YpzAVComubmHQdmm3R0x8IcPugYGFS1E gX4SXMZU8kyLNZWFuN3KCcPgyI9GlXt+BpYxhsgSf239WLKBpSMfIamg5VdaGdRhcs3Nc6NjE1Nfz fkr4fV3YPkGg8oXbEsqA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i1Kx1-0003hk-Om; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 01:34:43 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x64a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::64a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i1Kwx-0003gO-S7 for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 01:34:42 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x64a.google.com with SMTP id g7so3571519plm.8 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Zjjk/hNI/IaWxq0KcvGgj1clOn8R77PlBTrIcGoUruU=; b=ggw9j6YNBEMgPSzlBuFE27eua4Ov4IEbzPmsadTK7/H4bfyMBTaku/Okn/5O0M5CsJ 5FlAzBN5/KHr/0Epc2/1L8w66blJRvoOWduccIVHafJ+pwTwfeB7H6yiCd9Lo69rZZ1a 9Zs1I4wg1a0UGANeYrXdpsGw8a0cxp1xp6cMCbTuvNhmLvmbclMPLH6aLMS62IfCAcce UCWTQaQLBWnLTXVSw7XB6VjZ0kXZWwpDhb9wdtIig/3kBip1TlHHUbRivDe14QHPWmbz v3hLRt1llXBI9NN2r9M5U5/K6HJ8BMmc6bkETvLauf7bhBvOmjpS91kLZJH5xFotK8O7 eAiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Zjjk/hNI/IaWxq0KcvGgj1clOn8R77PlBTrIcGoUruU=; b=IfbAkgfnJifIepR7uuaoFwHnf6EpQLadqdx4riCzX5/pt3XhxjnZsfTzoZFre9qy4x kXpspYQ/HpGuOQJ/IVD2OntvEafMcz18sWrXDZ8Uze5gn3mpAhjprpAy8kC8RAGLR0dw xekm4fH+oP3bNv1qEIqyxDSs8tBV8jZdMrW2zz19k8pfROOw1Q+AlC3iuH3hxtChNI7w 5Y5d+76+TnfyebCl11dmTuA+5GKv6wpmBlkkr1CDMYEc2nmQLNeK7oOb4ZNexyXC4x77 ofG/T9dU1qTg67HRt8OAmYlzcsBF9KGuJ0i8Q/eRI7QwoY6p1zUB7yw9trrfAkjw8AlY wm/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX86Wx0/sd7Geix9V6lFJqXQhqFA7YVB9ExSdNjxJJYcbEDO85+ zfG3rPPZugn+g0xYnQ5151TxillfVtMhDM+TQ7ceNA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRy5NbAT8zFEPMPCWpO58LcQ91q67SR9ocyeMfRI16nyscbu6oRY+PMaWJLI/kByqsgeKanVm9P8lAjEuAeLb7Vw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:f357:: with SMTP id t23mr6524484pgj.421.1566610478075; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:34:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190824013425.175645-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Message-Id: <20190824013425.175645-2-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20190824013425.175645-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog Subject: [PATCH v15 01/18] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core From: Brendan Higgins To: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190823_183439_911783_870BDBAA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.50 ) X-Spam-Score: -7.7 (-------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-7.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:64a listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM white-list -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_MED DKIMwl.org - Medium sender X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pmladek@suse.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, amir73il@gmail.com, Brendan Higgins , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, wfg@linux.intel.com, joel@jms.id.au, rientjes@google.com, jdike@addtoit.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, richard@nod.at, rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org Add core facilities for defining unit tests; this provides a common way to define test cases, functions that execute code which is under test and determine whether the code under test behaves as expected; this also provides a way to group together related test cases in test suites (here we call them test_modules). Just define test cases and how to execute them for now; setting expectations on code will be defined later. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd --- include/kunit/test.h | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kunit/Kconfig | 17 ++++ kunit/Makefile | 1 + kunit/test.c | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 397 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/kunit/test.h create mode 100644 kunit/Kconfig create mode 100644 kunit/Makefile create mode 100644 kunit/test.c diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e30d1bf2fb68 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Base unit test (KUnit) API. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: Brendan Higgins + */ + +#ifndef _KUNIT_TEST_H +#define _KUNIT_TEST_H + +#include + +struct kunit; + +/** + * struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case. + * + * @run_case: the function representing the actual test case. + * @name: the name of the test case. + * + * A test case is a function with the signature, + * ``void (*)(struct kunit *)`` that makes expectations (see + * KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE()) about code under test. Each test case is associated + * with a &struct kunit_suite and will be run after the suite's init + * function and followed by the suite's exit function. + * + * A test case should be static and should only be created with the + * KUNIT_CASE() macro; additionally, every array of test cases should be + * terminated with an empty test case. + * + * Example: + * + * .. code-block:: c + * + * void add_test_basic(struct kunit *test) + * { + * KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, add(1, 0)); + * KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2, add(1, 1)); + * KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, add(-1, 1)); + * KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, INT_MAX, add(0, INT_MAX)); + * KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1, add(INT_MAX, INT_MIN)); + * } + * + * static struct kunit_case example_test_cases[] = { + * KUNIT_CASE(add_test_basic), + * {} + * }; + * + */ +struct kunit_case { + void (*run_case)(struct kunit *test); + const char *name; + + /* private: internal use only. */ + bool success; +}; + +/** + * KUNIT_CASE - A helper for creating a &struct kunit_case + * + * @test_name: a reference to a test case function. + * + * Takes a symbol for a function representing a test case and creates a + * &struct kunit_case object from it. See the documentation for + * &struct kunit_case for an example on how to use it. + */ +#define KUNIT_CASE(test_name) { .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name } + +/** + * struct kunit_suite - describes a related collection of &struct kunit_case + * + * @name: the name of the test. Purely informational. + * @init: called before every test case. + * @exit: called after every test case. + * @test_cases: a null terminated array of test cases. + * + * A kunit_suite is a collection of related &struct kunit_case s, such that + * @init is called before every test case and @exit is called after every + * test case, similar to the notion of a *test fixture* or a *test class* + * in other unit testing frameworks like JUnit or Googletest. + * + * Every &struct kunit_case must be associated with a kunit_suite for KUnit + * to run it. + */ +struct kunit_suite { + const char name[256]; + int (*init)(struct kunit *test); + void (*exit)(struct kunit *test); + struct kunit_case *test_cases; +}; + +/** + * struct kunit - represents a running instance of a test. + * + * @priv: for user to store arbitrary data. Commonly used to pass data + * created in the init function (see &struct kunit_suite). + * + * Used to store information about the current context under which the test + * is running. Most of this data is private and should only be accessed + * indirectly via public functions; the one exception is @priv which can be + * used by the test writer to store arbitrary data. + */ +struct kunit { + void *priv; + + /* private: internal use only. */ + const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ + /* + * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a + * test case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple + * threads using WRITE_ONCE; however, as a consequence, it may only + * be read after the test case finishes once all threads associated + * with the test case have terminated. + */ + bool success; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ +}; + +void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name); + +int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite); + +/** + * kunit_test_suite() - used to register a &struct kunit_suite with KUnit. + * + * @suite: a statically allocated &struct kunit_suite. + * + * Registers @suite with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for + * more information. + * + * NOTE: Currently KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means + * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init + * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit + * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase; + * another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in + * an earlier init phase. + * + * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Don't run all KUnit tests as + * late_initcalls. I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit + * tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after + * everything else is definitely initialized. + */ +#define kunit_test_suite(suite) \ + static int kunit_suite_init##suite(void) \ + { \ + return kunit_run_tests(&suite); \ + } \ + late_initcall(kunit_suite_init##suite) + +void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, + const struct kunit *test, + const char *fmt, ...); + +/** + * kunit_info() - Prints an INFO level message associated with @test. + * + * @test: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Prints an info level message associated with the test suite being run. + * Takes a variable number of format parameters just like printk(). + */ +#define kunit_info(test, fmt, ...) \ + kunit_printk(KERN_INFO, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + +/** + * kunit_warn() - Prints a WARN level message associated with @test. + * + * @test: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Prints a warning level message. + */ +#define kunit_warn(test, fmt, ...) \ + kunit_printk(KERN_WARNING, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + +/** + * kunit_err() - Prints an ERROR level message associated with @test. + * + * @test: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Prints an error level message. + */ +#define kunit_err(test, fmt, ...) \ + kunit_printk(KERN_ERR, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + +#endif /* _KUNIT_TEST_H */ diff --git a/kunit/Kconfig b/kunit/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..330ae83527c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/kunit/Kconfig @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# +# KUnit base configuration +# + +menu "KUnit support" + +config KUNIT + bool "Enable support for unit tests (KUnit)" + help + Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit + testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are + able to be run locally on a developer's workstation without a VM or + special hardware when using UML. Can also be used on most other + architectures. For more information, please see + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + +endmenu diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5efdc4dea2c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/kunit/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d3dda359f99b --- /dev/null +++ b/kunit/test.c @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Base unit test (KUnit) API. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: Brendan Higgins + */ + +#include +#include + +static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false); +} + +static int kunit_vprintk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, va_list args) +{ + return vprintk_emit(0, level, NULL, 0, fmt, args); +} + +static int kunit_printk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, ...) +{ + va_list args; + int ret; + + va_start(args, fmt); + ret = kunit_vprintk_emit(level, fmt, args); + va_end(args); + + return ret; +} + +static void kunit_vprintk(const struct kunit *test, + const char *level, + struct va_format *vaf) +{ + kunit_printk_emit(level[1] - '0', "\t# %s: %pV", test->name, vaf); +} + +static void kunit_print_tap_version(void) +{ + static bool kunit_has_printed_tap_version; + + if (!kunit_has_printed_tap_version) { + kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "TAP version 14\n"); + kunit_has_printed_tap_version = true; + } +} + +static size_t kunit_test_cases_len(struct kunit_case *test_cases) +{ + struct kunit_case *test_case; + size_t len = 0; + + for (test_case = test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) + len++; + + return len; +} + +static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) +{ + kunit_print_tap_version(); + kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name); + kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, + "\t1..%zd\n", + kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases)); +} + +static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent, + bool is_ok, + size_t test_number, + const char *description) +{ + const char *indent, *ok_not_ok; + + if (should_indent) + indent = "\t"; + else + indent = ""; + + if (is_ok) + ok_not_ok = "ok"; + else + ok_not_ok = "not ok"; + + kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, + "%s%s %zd - %s\n", + indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description); +} + +static bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) +{ + const struct kunit_case *test_case; + + for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) + if (!test_case->success) + return false; + + return true; +} + +static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite) +{ + static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1; + + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(false, + kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite), + kunit_suite_counter++, + suite->name); +} + +static void kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(struct kunit_case *test_case, + size_t test_number) +{ + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(true, + test_case->success, + test_number, + test_case->name); +} + +void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name) +{ + test->name = name; + test->success = true; +} + +/* + * Performs all logic to run a test case. + */ +static void kunit_run_case(struct kunit_suite *suite, + struct kunit_case *test_case) +{ + struct kunit test; + + kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name); + + if (suite->init) { + int ret; + + ret = suite->init(&test); + if (ret) { + kunit_err(&test, "failed to initialize: %d\n", ret); + kunit_set_failure(&test); + test_case->success = test.success; + return; + } + } + + test_case->run_case(&test); + + if (suite->exit) + suite->exit(&test); + + test_case->success = test.success; +} + +int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) +{ + struct kunit_case *test_case; + size_t test_case_count = 1; + + kunit_print_subtest_start(suite); + + for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) { + kunit_run_case(suite, test_case); + kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(test_case, test_case_count++); + } + + kunit_print_subtest_end(suite); + + return 0; +} + +void kunit_printk(const char *level, + const struct kunit *test, + const char *fmt, ...) +{ + struct va_format vaf; + va_list args; + + va_start(args, fmt); + + vaf.fmt = fmt; + vaf.va = &args; + + kunit_vprintk(test, level, &vaf); + + va_end(args); +}