| Message ID | 20190820141804.88799-1-iii@linux.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | BPF Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bpf] selftests/bpf: fix test_cgroup_storage on s390 | expand |
On 8/20/19 4:18 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > test_cgroup_storage fails on s390 with an assertion failure: packets are > dropped when they shouldn't. The problem is that BPF_DW packet count is > accessed as BPF_W with an offset of 0, which is not correct on > big-endian machines. > > Since the point of this test is not to verify narrow loads/stores, > simply use BPF_DW when working with packet counts. > > Fixes: 68cfa3ac6b8d ("selftests/bpf: add a cgroup storage test") > Fixes: 919646d2a3a9 ("selftests/bpf: extend the storage test to test per-cpu cgroup storage") > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c index 2fc4625c1a15..655729004391 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 0x1), - BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), /* map fd */ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */ @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1), BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0x1), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
test_cgroup_storage fails on s390 with an assertion failure: packets are dropped when they shouldn't. The problem is that BPF_DW packet count is accessed as BPF_W with an offset of 0, which is not correct on big-endian machines. Since the point of this test is not to verify narrow loads/stores, simply use BPF_DW when working with packet counts. Fixes: 68cfa3ac6b8d ("selftests/bpf: add a cgroup storage test") Fixes: 919646d2a3a9 ("selftests/bpf: extend the storage test to test per-cpu cgroup storage") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)