[05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX
diff mbox series

Message ID 20190815083716.4715-5-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series
  • [01/10] PCI: designware-ep: Add multiple PFs support for DWC
Related show

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 70 lines checked
snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch success Successfully applied on branch next (da206bd46848568e1aaf35f00e2d78bf9bc94f95)

Commit Message

Xiaowei Bao Aug. 15, 2019, 8:37 a.m. UTC
The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
capability, make it more flexible.

Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Murray Aug. 15, 2019, 12:51 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
> capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
> capability, make it more flexible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  
>  struct ls_pcie_ep {
>  	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
> +	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
>  };
>  
>  #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> @@ -40,25 +41,26 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
> -	.linkup_notifier = false,
> -	.msi_capable = true,
> -	.msix_capable = false,
> -};
> -
>  static const struct pci_epc_features*
>  ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>  {
> -	return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> +
> +	return pcie->ls_epc;
>  }
>  
>  static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>  {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
>  	enum pci_barno bar;
>  
>  	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
>  		dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> +
> +	pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
> +	pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
>  }
>  
>  static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> @@ -118,6 +120,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
>  	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> +	struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
>  	struct resource *dbi_base;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!pci)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ls_epc)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs");
>  	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
>  	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> @@ -139,6 +146,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
>  	pcie->pci = pci;
>  
> +	ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
> +	ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
> +	ls_epc->msix_capable = true,

As [msi,msix]_capable is shortly set from ls_pcie_ep_init - is there any
reason to set them here (to potentially incorrect values)?

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

> +	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> +
> +	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> +
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
>  
>  	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> -- 
> 2.9.5
>
Xiaowei Bao Aug. 16, 2019, 3 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> Sent: 2019年8月15日 20:51
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com; gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com;
> bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org;
> M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>;
> Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting
> capability with different PEX
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
> > capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
> > capability, make it more flexible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28
> > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >
> >  struct ls_pcie_ep {
> >  	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
> > +	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
> >  };
> >
> >  #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > @@ -40,25 +41,26 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> >  	{ },
> >  };
> >
> > -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
> > -	.linkup_notifier = false,
> > -	.msi_capable = true,
> > -	.msix_capable = false,
> > -};
> > -
> >  static const struct pci_epc_features*  ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct
> > dw_pcie_ep *ep)  {
> > -	return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > +
> > +	return pcie->ls_epc;
> >  }
> >
> >  static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)  {
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> >  	enum pci_barno bar;
> >
> >  	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
> >  		dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> > +
> > +	pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
> > +	pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, @@
> > -118,6 +120,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> >  	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> > +	struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> >  	struct resource *dbi_base;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (!pci)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > +	ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!ls_epc)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> >  	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> "regs");
> >  	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > @@ -139,6 +146,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >  	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> >  	pcie->pci = pci;
> >
> > +	ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
> > +	ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
> > +	ls_epc->msix_capable = true,
> 
> As [msi,msix]_capable is shortly set from ls_pcie_ep_init - is there any reason
> to set them here (to potentially incorrect values)?
This is a INIT value, maybe false is better for msi_capable and msix_capable, 
of course, we don't need to set it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Murray
> 
> > +	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > +
> > +	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > +
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> >
> >  	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > --
> > 2.9.5
> >
Andrew Murray Aug. 16, 2019, 10:25 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:00:00AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> > Sent: 2019年8月15日 20:51
> > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com; gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com;
> > bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> > shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com;
> > lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org;
> > M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>;
> > Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting
> > capability with different PEX
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
> > > capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
> > > capability, make it more flexible.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28
> > > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > >
> > >  struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > >  	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
> > > +	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > @@ -40,25 +41,26 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > >  	{ },
> > >  };
> > >
> > > -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
> > > -	.linkup_notifier = false,
> > > -	.msi_capable = true,
> > > -	.msix_capable = false,
> > > -};
> > > -
> > >  static const struct pci_epc_features*  ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct
> > > dw_pcie_ep *ep)  {
> > > -	return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
> > > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > +
> > > +	return pcie->ls_epc;
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)  {
> > >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > >  	enum pci_barno bar;
> > >
> > >  	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
> > >  		dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> > > +
> > > +	pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
> > > +	pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, @@
> > > -118,6 +120,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > >  	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> > > +	struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > >  	struct resource *dbi_base;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	if (!pci)
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > +	ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +	if (!ls_epc)
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > >  	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > "regs");
> > >  	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > >  	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > @@ -139,6 +146,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > >  	pcie->pci = pci;
> > >
> > > +	ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
> > > +	ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
> > > +	ls_epc->msix_capable = true,
> > 
> > As [msi,msix]_capable is shortly set from ls_pcie_ep_init - is there any reason
> > to set them here (to potentially incorrect values)?
> This is a INIT value, maybe false is better for msi_capable and msix_capable, 
> of course, we don't need to set it.

ls_epc is kzalloc'd and so all zeros, so you get false for free. I think you
can remove these two lines (or all three if you don't care that linkup_notifier
isn't explicitly set).

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andrew Murray
> > 
> > > +	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > > +
> > > +	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > > +
> > >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > >
> > >  	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > > --
> > > 2.9.5
> > >
Xiaowei Bao Aug. 16, 2019, 11:03 a.m. UTC | #4
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> Sent: 2019年8月16日 18:26
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com; gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com;
> bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org;
> M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>;
> Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Z.q. Hou
> <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting
> capability with different PEX
> 
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:00:00AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> > > Sent: 2019年8月15日 20:51
> > > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com; gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com;
> > > bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> > > shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com;
> > > lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; arnd@arndb.de;
> > > gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>;
> > > Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>;
> > > linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > > linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of
> > > getting capability with different PEX
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > > The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
> > > > capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
> > > > capability, make it more flexible.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > > >
> > > >  struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > >  	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
> > > > +	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > > @@ -40,25 +41,26 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > > ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > >  	{ },
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
> > > > -	.linkup_notifier = false,
> > > > -	.msi_capable = true,
> > > > -	.msix_capable = false,
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > > >  static const struct pci_epc_features*
> > > > ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)  {
> > > > -	return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
> > > > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return pcie->ls_epc;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)  {
> > > >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > >  	enum pci_barno bar;
> > > >
> > > >  	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
> > > >  		dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> > > > +
> > > > +	pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
> > > > +	pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8
> > > > func_no, @@
> > > > -118,6 +120,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > >  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > >  	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> > > > +	struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > > >  	struct resource *dbi_base;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > >  	if (!pci)
> > > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > +	ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +	if (!ls_epc)
> > > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > >  	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > "regs");
> > > >  	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > >  	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > > @@ -139,6 +146,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > >  	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > > >  	pcie->pci = pci;
> > > >
> > > > +	ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
> > > > +	ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
> > > > +	ls_epc->msix_capable = true,
> > >
> > > As [msi,msix]_capable is shortly set from ls_pcie_ep_init - is there
> > > any reason to set them here (to potentially incorrect values)?
> > This is a INIT value, maybe false is better for msi_capable and
> > msix_capable, of course, we don't need to set it.
> 
> ls_epc is kzalloc'd and so all zeros, so you get false for free. I think you can
> remove these two lines (or all three if you don't care that linkup_notifier isn't
> explicitly set).
Agree, This is correct, thanks a lot.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Murray
> 
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Andrew Murray
> > >
> > > > +	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > > > +
> > > > +	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > > > +
> > > >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > > >
> > > >  	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.9.5
> > > >

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ 
 
 struct ls_pcie_ep {
 	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
+	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
 };
 
 #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
@@ -40,25 +41,26 @@  static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
 	{ },
 };
 
-static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
-	.linkup_notifier = false,
-	.msi_capable = true,
-	.msix_capable = false,
-};
-
 static const struct pci_epc_features*
 ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
-	return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
+
+	return pcie->ls_epc;
 }
 
 static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
 	enum pci_barno bar;
 
 	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
 		dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
+
+	pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
+	pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
 }
 
 static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
@@ -118,6 +120,7 @@  static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct dw_pcie *pci;
 	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
+	struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
 	struct resource *dbi_base;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -129,6 +132,10 @@  static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!pci)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ls_epc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs");
 	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
 	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
@@ -139,6 +146,13 @@  static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
 	pcie->pci = pci;
 
+	ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
+	ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
+	ls_epc->msix_capable = true,
+	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
+
+	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
 
 	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);