From patchwork Fri Aug 9 07:45:17 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Aneesh Kumar K V X-Patchwork-Id: 1144479 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464cnQ3hQtz9s3Z for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:48:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464cnQ2qK3zDqs1 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:48:58 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464cjf5qQyzDqW8 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:45:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x797i6KU131658; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 03:45:38 -0400 Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2u93rxt5xg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Aug 2019 03:45:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x797hiui004382; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:37 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2u51w66ww8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:45:37 +0000 Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.234]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x797jaiM61341998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:36 GMT Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B9E6A047; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B246A051; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.199.36.73]) by b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:33 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] nvdimm: Consider probe return -EOPNOTSUPP as success Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:15:17 +0530 Message-Id: <20190809074520.27115-2-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190809074520.27115-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190809074520.27115-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-09_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908090080 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This patch add -EOPNOTSUPP as return from probe callback to indicate we were not able to initialize a namespace due to pfn superblock feature/version mismatch. We want to consider this a probe success so that we can create new namesapce seed and there by avoid marking the failed namespace as the seed namespace. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- drivers/nvdimm/bus.c | 2 +- drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c index 798c5c4aea9c..16c35e6446a7 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int nvdimm_bus_probe(struct device *dev) rc = nd_drv->probe(dev); debug_nvdimm_unlock(dev); - if (rc == 0) + if (rc == 0 || rc == -EOPNOTSUPP) nd_region_probe_success(nvdimm_bus, dev); else nd_region_disable(nvdimm_bus, dev); diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c index 4c121dd03dd9..3f498881dd28 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c @@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static int pmem_attach_disk(struct device *dev, static int nd_pmem_probe(struct device *dev) { + int ret; struct nd_namespace_common *ndns; ndns = nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(dev); @@ -505,12 +506,29 @@ static int nd_pmem_probe(struct device *dev) if (is_nd_pfn(dev)) return pmem_attach_disk(dev, ndns); - /* if we find a valid info-block we'll come back as that personality */ - if (nd_btt_probe(dev, ndns) == 0 || nd_pfn_probe(dev, ndns) == 0 - || nd_dax_probe(dev, ndns) == 0) + ret = nd_btt_probe(dev, ndns); + if (ret == 0) return -ENXIO; + else if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) + return ret; - /* ...otherwise we're just a raw pmem device */ + ret = nd_pfn_probe(dev, ndns); + if (ret == 0) + return -ENXIO; + else if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) + return ret; + + ret = nd_dax_probe(dev, ndns); + if (ret == 0) + return -ENXIO; + else if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) + return ret; + /* + * We have two failure conditions here, there is no + * info reserver block or we found a valid info reserve block + * but failed to initialize the pfn superblock. + * Don't create a raw pmem disk for the second case. + */ return pmem_attach_disk(dev, ndns); }