| Message ID | 1564688200-18901-1-git-send-email-pc@us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [powerpc] fe{en,dis}ableexcept, fesetmode: optimize FPSCR accesses | expand |
On 8/1/19 2:36 PM, Paul A. Clarke wrote: > From: "Paul A. Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com> > > Since fe{en,dis}ableexcept() and fesetmode() read-modify-write just the > "mode" (exception enable and rounding mode) bits of the Floating Point Status > Control Register (FPSCR), the lighter weight 'mffsl' instruction can be used > to read the FPSCR (enables and rounding mode), and 'mtfsf 0b00000011' can be > used to write just those bits back to the FPSCR. The net is better performance. > > In addition, fe{en,dis}ableexcept() read the FPSCR again after writing it, or > they determine that it doesn't need to be written because it is not changing. > In either case, the local variable holds the current values of the enable > bits in the FPSCR. This local variable can be used instead of again reading > the FPSCR. > > Also, that value of the FPSCR which is read the second time is validated > against the requested enables. Since the write can't fail, this validation > step is unnecessary, and can be removed. The write to FPSCR may not fail, but it may not change all the requested bits. e.g fedisableexcept(FE_INVALID_SQRT). Should the existing behavior be preserved? > > Finally, convert the local macros in fesetmode.c to more generally useful > macros in fenv_libc.h. > > 2019-08-01 Paul A. Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> > > * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h (fesetenv_mode): New. > (FPSCR_FPRF_MASK): New. (FPSCR_STATUS_MASK): New. > * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c (feenableexcept): Use lighter- > weight access to FPSCR; remove unnecessary second FPSCR read and > validate. > * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c (fedisableexcept): Likewise. > * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c (fesetmode): Use lighter-weight > access to FPSCR; Use macros in fenv_libc.h in favor of local. > --- > sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c | 8 +++----- > sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c | 9 +++------ > sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h | 10 +++++++++- > sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c | 15 +++++---------- > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c > index 5cc8799..fa666b0 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c > +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ fedisableexcept (int excepts) > int result, new; > > /* Get current exception mask to return. */ > - fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_register (); > + fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_status (); > result = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); > > if ((excepts & FE_ALL_INVALID) == FE_ALL_INVALID) > @@ -36,13 +36,11 @@ fedisableexcept (int excepts) > fe.l &= ~ fenv_exceptions_to_reg (excepts); > > if (fe.l != curr.l) > - fesetenv_register (fe.fenv); > + fesetenv_mode (fe.fenv); > > - new = __fegetexcept (); > + new = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); > if (new == 0 && result != 0) > (void)__fe_mask_env (); > > - if ((new & excepts) != 0) > - result = -1; > return result; > } > diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c > index 3b64398..c658290 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c > +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ feenableexcept (int excepts) > int result, new; > > /* Get current exception mask to return. */ > - fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_register (); > + fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_status (); > result = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); > > if ((excepts & FE_ALL_INVALID) == FE_ALL_INVALID) > @@ -36,14 +36,11 @@ feenableexcept (int excepts) > fe.l |= fenv_exceptions_to_reg (excepts); > > if (fe.l != curr.l) > - fesetenv_register (fe.fenv); > + fesetenv_mode (fe.fenv); > > - new = __fegetexcept (); > + new = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); > if (new != 0 && result == 0) > (void) __fe_nomask_env_priv (); > > - if ((new & excepts) != excepts) > - result = -1; > - > return result; > } > diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h > index 853239f..8ba4832 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h > +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h > @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ extern const fenv_t *__fe_mask_env (void) attribute_hidden; > __builtin_mtfsf (0xff, d); \ > } while(0) > > +/* Set the last 2 nibbles of the FPSCR, which contain the > + exception enables and the rounding mode. > + 'fegetenv_status' retrieves these bits by reading the FPSCR. */ > +#define fesetenv_mode(env) __builtin_mtfsf (0b00000011, (env)); > + > /* This very handy macro: > - Sets the rounding mode to 'round to nearest'; > - Sets the processor into IEEE mode; and > @@ -206,8 +211,11 @@ enum { > (FPSCR_VE_MASK|FPSCR_OE_MASK|FPSCR_UE_MASK|FPSCR_ZE_MASK|FPSCR_XE_MASK) > #define FPSCR_BASIC_EXCEPTIONS_MASK \ > (FPSCR_VX_MASK|FPSCR_OX_MASK|FPSCR_UX_MASK|FPSCR_ZX_MASK|FPSCR_XX_MASK) > - > +#define FPSCR_FPRF_MASK \ > + (FPSCR_FPRF_C_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FL_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FG_MASK| \ > + FPSCR_FPRF_FE_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FU_MASK) > #define FPSCR_CONTROL_MASK (FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK|FPSCR_NI_MASK|FPSCR_RN_MASK) > +#define FPSCR_STATUS_MASK (FPSCR_FR_MASK|FPSCR_FI_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_MASK) > > /* The bits in the FENV(1) ABI for exceptions correspond one-to-one with bits > in the FPSCR, albeit shifted to different but corresponding locations. > diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c > index 4f4f71a..e92559b 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c > +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c > @@ -19,11 +19,6 @@ > #include <fenv_libc.h> > #include <fpu_control.h> > > -#define _FPU_MASK_ALL (_FPU_MASK_ZM | _FPU_MASK_OM | _FPU_MASK_UM \ > - | _FPU_MASK_XM | _FPU_MASK_IM) > - > -#define FPU_STATUS 0xbffff700ULL > - > int > fesetmode (const femode_t *modep) > { > @@ -32,18 +27,18 @@ fesetmode (const femode_t *modep) > /* Logic regarding enabled exceptions as in fesetenv. */ > > new.fenv = *modep; > - old.fenv = fegetenv_register (); > - new.l = (new.l & ~FPU_STATUS) | (old.l & FPU_STATUS); > + old.fenv = fegetenv_status (); > + new.l = (new.l & ~FPSCR_STATUS_MASK) | (old.l & FPSCR_STATUS_MASK); > > if (old.l == new.l) > return 0; > > - if ((old.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) == 0 && (new.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) != 0) > + if ((old.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) == 0 && (new.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) != 0) > (void) __fe_nomask_env_priv (); > > - if ((old.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) != 0 && (new.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) == 0) > + if ((old.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) != 0 && (new.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) == 0) > (void) __fe_mask_env (); > > - fesetenv_register (new.fenv); > + fesetenv_mode (new.fenv); > return 0; > } >
On 8/1/19 7:04 PM, Paul E Murphy wrote: > On 8/1/19 2:36 PM, Paul A. Clarke wrote: >> Since fe{en,dis}ableexcept() and fesetmode() read-modify-write just the >> "mode" (exception enable and rounding mode) bits of the Floating Point Status >> Control Register (FPSCR), the lighter weight 'mffsl' instruction can be used >> to read the FPSCR (enables and rounding mode), and 'mtfsf 0b00000011' can be >> used to write just those bits back to the FPSCR. The net is better performance. >> >> In addition, fe{en,dis}ableexcept() read the FPSCR again after writing it, or >> they determine that it doesn't need to be written because it is not changing. >> In either case, the local variable holds the current values of the enable >> bits in the FPSCR. This local variable can be used instead of again reading >> the FPSCR. >> >> Also, that value of the FPSCR which is read the second time is validated >> against the requested enables. Since the write can't fail, this validation >> step is unnecessary, and can be removed. > > The write to FPSCR may not fail, but it may not change all the > requested bits. e.g fedisableexcept(FE_INVALID_SQRT). Should the > existing behavior be preserved? That's an interesting question. The current unpatched code will apparently accept all possible exception bits, enable (or disable) the ones it can, and return -1 if the set (or unset) bits don't match the requested bits. For the INVALID bits, these are transformed into FE_INVALID iff all of the defined INVALID bits are set. So, the case of "feenableexcept (FE_OVERFLOW|FE_INVALID_SQRT)" would result in FE_OVERFLOW being enabled, yet the function returns failure because FE_INVALID_SQRT is not. Is the side effect of enabling FE_OVERFLOW but returning failure appropriate? Should the enablement be reverted in that case (all-or-nothing enabled) to avoid side-effects on failure? Are you just asking about the whether the requested bits _can_ be set? That could be determined without reading (or re-reading) the FPSCR. Should that be done up-front, before attempting to set the FPSCR at all, and returning failure if so? Is there a crisp definition of the expected operation of these functions? The man page is wanting. >> Finally, convert the local macros in fesetmode.c to more generally useful >> macros in fenv_libc.h. >> >> 2019-08-01 Paul A. Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> >> >> * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h (fesetenv_mode): New. >> (FPSCR_FPRF_MASK): New. (FPSCR_STATUS_MASK): New. >> * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c (feenableexcept): Use lighter- >> weight access to FPSCR; remove unnecessary second FPSCR read and >> validate. >> * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c (fedisableexcept): Likewise. >> * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c (fesetmode): Use lighter-weight >> access to FPSCR; Use macros in fenv_libc.h in favor of local. >> --- >> sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c | 8 +++----- >> sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c | 9 +++------ >> sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h | 10 +++++++++- >> sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c | 15 +++++---------- >> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c >> index 5cc8799..fa666b0 100644 >> --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c >> +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c >> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ fedisableexcept (int excepts) >> int result, new; >> >> /* Get current exception mask to return. */ >> - fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_register (); >> + fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_status (); >> result = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); >> >> if ((excepts & FE_ALL_INVALID) == FE_ALL_INVALID) >> @@ -36,13 +36,11 @@ fedisableexcept (int excepts) >> fe.l &= ~ fenv_exceptions_to_reg (excepts); >> >> if (fe.l != curr.l) >> - fesetenv_register (fe.fenv); >> + fesetenv_mode (fe.fenv); >> >> - new = __fegetexcept (); >> + new = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); >> if (new == 0 && result != 0) >> (void)__fe_mask_env (); >> >> - if ((new & excepts) != 0) >> - result = -1; >> return result; >> } >> diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c >> index 3b64398..c658290 100644 >> --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c >> +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c >> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ feenableexcept (int excepts) >> int result, new; >> >> /* Get current exception mask to return. */ >> - fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_register (); >> + fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_status (); >> result = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); >> >> if ((excepts & FE_ALL_INVALID) == FE_ALL_INVALID) >> @@ -36,14 +36,11 @@ feenableexcept (int excepts) >> fe.l |= fenv_exceptions_to_reg (excepts); >> >> if (fe.l != curr.l) >> - fesetenv_register (fe.fenv); >> + fesetenv_mode (fe.fenv); >> >> - new = __fegetexcept (); >> + new = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); >> if (new != 0 && result == 0) >> (void) __fe_nomask_env_priv (); >> >> - if ((new & excepts) != excepts) >> - result = -1; >> - >> return result; >> } >> diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h >> index 853239f..8ba4832 100644 >> --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h >> +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h >> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ extern const fenv_t *__fe_mask_env (void) attribute_hidden; >> __builtin_mtfsf (0xff, d); \ >> } while(0) >> >> +/* Set the last 2 nibbles of the FPSCR, which contain the >> + exception enables and the rounding mode. >> + 'fegetenv_status' retrieves these bits by reading the FPSCR. */ >> +#define fesetenv_mode(env) __builtin_mtfsf (0b00000011, (env)); >> + >> /* This very handy macro: >> - Sets the rounding mode to 'round to nearest'; >> - Sets the processor into IEEE mode; and >> @@ -206,8 +211,11 @@ enum { >> (FPSCR_VE_MASK|FPSCR_OE_MASK|FPSCR_UE_MASK|FPSCR_ZE_MASK|FPSCR_XE_MASK) >> #define FPSCR_BASIC_EXCEPTIONS_MASK \ >> (FPSCR_VX_MASK|FPSCR_OX_MASK|FPSCR_UX_MASK|FPSCR_ZX_MASK|FPSCR_XX_MASK) >> - >> +#define FPSCR_FPRF_MASK \ >> + (FPSCR_FPRF_C_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FL_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FG_MASK| \ >> + FPSCR_FPRF_FE_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FU_MASK) >> #define FPSCR_CONTROL_MASK (FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK|FPSCR_NI_MASK|FPSCR_RN_MASK) >> +#define FPSCR_STATUS_MASK (FPSCR_FR_MASK|FPSCR_FI_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_MASK) >> >> /* The bits in the FENV(1) ABI for exceptions correspond one-to-one with bits >> in the FPSCR, albeit shifted to different but corresponding locations. >> diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c >> index 4f4f71a..e92559b 100644 >> --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c >> +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c >> @@ -19,11 +19,6 @@ >> #include <fenv_libc.h> >> #include <fpu_control.h> >> >> -#define _FPU_MASK_ALL (_FPU_MASK_ZM | _FPU_MASK_OM | _FPU_MASK_UM \ >> - | _FPU_MASK_XM | _FPU_MASK_IM) >> - >> -#define FPU_STATUS 0xbffff700ULL >> - >> int >> fesetmode (const femode_t *modep) >> { >> @@ -32,18 +27,18 @@ fesetmode (const femode_t *modep) >> /* Logic regarding enabled exceptions as in fesetenv. */ >> >> new.fenv = *modep; >> - old.fenv = fegetenv_register (); >> - new.l = (new.l & ~FPU_STATUS) | (old.l & FPU_STATUS); >> + old.fenv = fegetenv_status (); >> + new.l = (new.l & ~FPSCR_STATUS_MASK) | (old.l & FPSCR_STATUS_MASK); >> >> if (old.l == new.l) >> return 0; >> >> - if ((old.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) == 0 && (new.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) != 0) >> + if ((old.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) == 0 && (new.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) != 0) >> (void) __fe_nomask_env_priv (); >> >> - if ((old.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) != 0 && (new.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) == 0) >> + if ((old.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) != 0 && (new.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) == 0) >> (void) __fe_mask_env (); >> >> - fesetenv_register (new.fenv); >> + fesetenv_mode (new.fenv); >> return 0; >> } PC
On 8/1/19 11:01 PM, Paul Clarke wrote: > On 8/1/19 7:04 PM, Paul E Murphy wrote: >> On 8/1/19 2:36 PM, Paul A. Clarke wrote: >>> Since fe{en,dis}ableexcept() and fesetmode() read-modify-write just the >>> "mode" (exception enable and rounding mode) bits of the Floating Point Status >>> Control Register (FPSCR), the lighter weight 'mffsl' instruction can be used >>> to read the FPSCR (enables and rounding mode), and 'mtfsf 0b00000011' can be >>> used to write just those bits back to the FPSCR. The net is better performance. >>> >>> In addition, fe{en,dis}ableexcept() read the FPSCR again after writing it, or >>> they determine that it doesn't need to be written because it is not changing. >>> In either case, the local variable holds the current values of the enable >>> bits in the FPSCR. This local variable can be used instead of again reading >>> the FPSCR. >>> >>> Also, that value of the FPSCR which is read the second time is validated >>> against the requested enables. Since the write can't fail, this validation >>> step is unnecessary, and can be removed. >> >> The write to FPSCR may not fail, but it may not change all the >> requested bits. e.g fedisableexcept(FE_INVALID_SQRT). Should the >> existing behavior be preserved? > > That's an interesting question. The current unpatched code will apparently accept all possible exception bits, enable (or disable) the ones it can, and return -1 if the set (or unset) bits don't match the requested bits. > > For the INVALID bits, these are transformed into FE_INVALID iff all of the defined INVALID bits are set. > > So, the case of "feenableexcept (FE_OVERFLOW|FE_INVALID_SQRT)" would result in FE_OVERFLOW being enabled, yet the function returns failure because FE_INVALID_SQRT is not. Is the side effect of enabling FE_OVERFLOW but returning failure appropriate? Should the enablement be reverted in that case (all-or-nothing enabled) to avoid side-effects on failure? > > Are you just asking about the whether the requested bits _can_ be set? That could be determined without reading (or re-reading) the FPSCR. Should that be done up-front, before attempting to set the FPSCR at all, and returning failure if so? > > Is there a crisp definition of the expected operation of these functions? The man page is wanting. > Specifically, I think the existing behavior should be preserved. The C99 standard constrains the behavior. The disable should return a negative value if any requested exception could not be disabled.
diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c index 5cc8799..fa666b0 100644 --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ fedisableexcept (int excepts) int result, new; /* Get current exception mask to return. */ - fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_register (); + fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_status (); result = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); if ((excepts & FE_ALL_INVALID) == FE_ALL_INVALID) @@ -36,13 +36,11 @@ fedisableexcept (int excepts) fe.l &= ~ fenv_exceptions_to_reg (excepts); if (fe.l != curr.l) - fesetenv_register (fe.fenv); + fesetenv_mode (fe.fenv); - new = __fegetexcept (); + new = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); if (new == 0 && result != 0) (void)__fe_mask_env (); - if ((new & excepts) != 0) - result = -1; return result; } diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c index 3b64398..c658290 100644 --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ feenableexcept (int excepts) int result, new; /* Get current exception mask to return. */ - fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_register (); + fe.fenv = curr.fenv = fegetenv_status (); result = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); if ((excepts & FE_ALL_INVALID) == FE_ALL_INVALID) @@ -36,14 +36,11 @@ feenableexcept (int excepts) fe.l |= fenv_exceptions_to_reg (excepts); if (fe.l != curr.l) - fesetenv_register (fe.fenv); + fesetenv_mode (fe.fenv); - new = __fegetexcept (); + new = fenv_reg_to_exceptions (fe.l); if (new != 0 && result == 0) (void) __fe_nomask_env_priv (); - if ((new & excepts) != excepts) - result = -1; - return result; } diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h index 853239f..8ba4832 100644 --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ extern const fenv_t *__fe_mask_env (void) attribute_hidden; __builtin_mtfsf (0xff, d); \ } while(0) +/* Set the last 2 nibbles of the FPSCR, which contain the + exception enables and the rounding mode. + 'fegetenv_status' retrieves these bits by reading the FPSCR. */ +#define fesetenv_mode(env) __builtin_mtfsf (0b00000011, (env)); + /* This very handy macro: - Sets the rounding mode to 'round to nearest'; - Sets the processor into IEEE mode; and @@ -206,8 +211,11 @@ enum { (FPSCR_VE_MASK|FPSCR_OE_MASK|FPSCR_UE_MASK|FPSCR_ZE_MASK|FPSCR_XE_MASK) #define FPSCR_BASIC_EXCEPTIONS_MASK \ (FPSCR_VX_MASK|FPSCR_OX_MASK|FPSCR_UX_MASK|FPSCR_ZX_MASK|FPSCR_XX_MASK) - +#define FPSCR_FPRF_MASK \ + (FPSCR_FPRF_C_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FL_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FG_MASK| \ + FPSCR_FPRF_FE_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_FU_MASK) #define FPSCR_CONTROL_MASK (FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK|FPSCR_NI_MASK|FPSCR_RN_MASK) +#define FPSCR_STATUS_MASK (FPSCR_FR_MASK|FPSCR_FI_MASK|FPSCR_FPRF_MASK) /* The bits in the FENV(1) ABI for exceptions correspond one-to-one with bits in the FPSCR, albeit shifted to different but corresponding locations. diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c index 4f4f71a..e92559b 100644 --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c @@ -19,11 +19,6 @@ #include <fenv_libc.h> #include <fpu_control.h> -#define _FPU_MASK_ALL (_FPU_MASK_ZM | _FPU_MASK_OM | _FPU_MASK_UM \ - | _FPU_MASK_XM | _FPU_MASK_IM) - -#define FPU_STATUS 0xbffff700ULL - int fesetmode (const femode_t *modep) { @@ -32,18 +27,18 @@ fesetmode (const femode_t *modep) /* Logic regarding enabled exceptions as in fesetenv. */ new.fenv = *modep; - old.fenv = fegetenv_register (); - new.l = (new.l & ~FPU_STATUS) | (old.l & FPU_STATUS); + old.fenv = fegetenv_status (); + new.l = (new.l & ~FPSCR_STATUS_MASK) | (old.l & FPSCR_STATUS_MASK); if (old.l == new.l) return 0; - if ((old.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) == 0 && (new.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) != 0) + if ((old.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) == 0 && (new.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) != 0) (void) __fe_nomask_env_priv (); - if ((old.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) != 0 && (new.l & _FPU_MASK_ALL) == 0) + if ((old.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) != 0 && (new.l & FPSCR_ENABLES_MASK) == 0) (void) __fe_mask_env (); - fesetenv_register (new.fenv); + fesetenv_mode (new.fenv); return 0; }
From: "Paul A. Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com> Since fe{en,dis}ableexcept() and fesetmode() read-modify-write just the "mode" (exception enable and rounding mode) bits of the Floating Point Status Control Register (FPSCR), the lighter weight 'mffsl' instruction can be used to read the FPSCR (enables and rounding mode), and 'mtfsf 0b00000011' can be used to write just those bits back to the FPSCR. The net is better performance. In addition, fe{en,dis}ableexcept() read the FPSCR again after writing it, or they determine that it doesn't need to be written because it is not changing. In either case, the local variable holds the current values of the enable bits in the FPSCR. This local variable can be used instead of again reading the FPSCR. Also, that value of the FPSCR which is read the second time is validated against the requested enables. Since the write can't fail, this validation step is unnecessary, and can be removed. Finally, convert the local macros in fesetmode.c to more generally useful macros in fenv_libc.h. 2019-08-01 Paul A. Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h (fesetenv_mode): New. (FPSCR_FPRF_MASK): New. (FPSCR_STATUS_MASK): New. * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c (feenableexcept): Use lighter- weight access to FPSCR; remove unnecessary second FPSCR read and validate. * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c (fedisableexcept): Likewise. * sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c (fesetmode): Use lighter-weight access to FPSCR; Use macros in fenv_libc.h in favor of local. --- sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fedisblxcpt.c | 8 +++----- sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/feenablxcpt.c | 9 +++------ sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fenv_libc.h | 10 +++++++++- sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/fesetmode.c | 15 +++++---------- 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)