[iproute2,2/2] tc: batch: fix line/line_next processing in batch

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>

When getcmdline fails, there is no valid string in line_next.
So change the flow and don't process it. Alongside with that,
free the previous line buffer and prevent memory leak.

Fixes: 485d0c6001c4 ("tc: Add batchsize feature for filter and actions")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
---
 tc/tc.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:25:38 +0200
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:

> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
> 
> When getcmdline fails, there is no valid string in line_next.
> So change the flow and don't process it. Alongside with that,
> free the previous line buffer and prevent memory leak.
> 
> Fixes: 485d0c6001c4 ("tc: Add batchsize feature for filter and actions")
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>


This is not sufficient to avoid valgrind detected uninitialized memory.
The following changes to your patch (#2 alone) is enough to fix
the issue.

The logic here is still a mess and needs to be cleaned up to avoid
future related bugs.

From bbcc22899566556ced9692e4811aea2a38817834 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:25:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tc: batch: fix line/line_next processing in batch

When getcmdline fails, there is no valid string in line_next.
So change the flow and don't process it. Alongside with that,
free the previous line buffer and prevent memory leak.

Also, avoid passing uninitialized memory to filters.

Fixes: 485d0c6001c4 ("tc: Add batchsize feature for filter and actions")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 tc/tc.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tc/tc.c b/tc/tc.c
index 64e342dd85bf..95e5481955ad 100644
--- a/tc/tc.c
+++ b/tc/tc.c
@@ -325,11 +325,10 @@ static int batch(const char *name)
 {
 	struct batch_buf *head = NULL, *tail = NULL, *buf_pool = NULL;
 	char *largv[100], *largv_next[100];
-	char *line, *line_next = NULL;
+	char *line = NULL, *line_next = NULL;
 	bool bs_enabled = false;
 	bool lastline = false;
 	int largc, largc_next;
-	bool bs_enabled_saved;
 	bool bs_enabled_next;
 	int batchsize = 0;
 	size_t len = 0;
@@ -360,47 +359,40 @@ static int batch(const char *name)
 	largc = makeargs(line, largv, 100);
 	bs_enabled = batchsize_enabled(largc, largv);
 	do {
-		if (getcmdline(&line_next, &len, stdin) == -1)
+		if (getcmdline(&line_next, &len, stdin) == -1) {
 			lastline = true;
-
-		largc_next = makeargs(line_next, largv_next, 100);
-		bs_enabled_next = batchsize_enabled(largc_next, largv_next);
-		if (bs_enabled) {
-			struct batch_buf *buf;
-
-			buf = get_batch_buf(&buf_pool, &head, &tail);
-			if (!buf) {
-				fprintf(stderr,
-					"failed to allocate batch_buf\n");
-				return -1;
-			}
-			++batchsize;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * In batch mode, if we haven't accumulated enough commands
-		 * and this is not the last command and this command & next
-		 * command both support the batchsize feature, don't send the
-		 * message immediately.
-		 */
-		if (!lastline && bs_enabled && bs_enabled_next
-		    && batchsize != MSG_IOV_MAX)
-			send = false;
-		else
 			send = true;
+		} else {
+			largc_next = makeargs(line_next, largv_next, 100);
+			bs_enabled_next = batchsize_enabled(largc_next, largv_next);
+			if (bs_enabled) {
+				struct batch_buf *buf;
+
+				buf = get_batch_buf(&buf_pool, &head, &tail);
+				if (!buf) {
+					fprintf(stderr,
+						"failed to allocate batch_buf\n");
+					return -1;
+				}
+				++batchsize;
+			}
 
-		line = line_next;
-		line_next = NULL;
-		len = 0;
-		bs_enabled_saved = bs_enabled;
-		bs_enabled = bs_enabled_next;
-
-		if (largc == 0) {
-			largc = largc_next;
-			memcpy(largv, largv_next, largc * sizeof(char *));
-			continue;	/* blank line */
+			/*
+			 * In batch mode, if we haven't accumulated enough
+			 * commands and this is not the last command and this
+			 * command & next command both support the batchsize
+			 * feature, don't send the message immediately.
+			 */
+			if (bs_enabled && bs_enabled_next
+			    && batchsize != MSG_IOV_MAX)
+				send = false;
+			else
+				send = true;
 		}
 
+		if (largc == 0)
+			goto to_next_line;	/* blank line */
+
 		err = do_cmd(largc, largv, tail == NULL ? NULL : tail->buf,
 			     tail == NULL ? 0 : sizeof(tail->buf));
 		fflush(stdout);
@@ -411,10 +403,8 @@ static int batch(const char *name)
 			if (!force)
 				break;
 		}
-		largc = largc_next;
-		memcpy(largv, largv_next, largc * sizeof(char *));
 
-		if (send && bs_enabled_saved) {
+		if (send && bs_enabled) {
 			struct iovec *iov, *iovs;
 			struct batch_buf *buf;
 			struct nlmsghdr *n;
@@ -438,6 +428,18 @@ static int batch(const char *name)
 			}
 			batchsize = 0;
 		}
+
+to_next_line:
+		if (lastline)
+			continue;
+		free(line);
+		line = line_next;
+		line_next = NULL;
+		len = 0;
+		bs_enabled = bs_enabled_next;
+		largc = largc_next;
+		memcpy(largv, largv_next, largc * sizeof(char *));
+
 	} while (!lastline);
 
 	free_batch_bufs(&buf_pool);