[v3,bpf,1/3] bpf: fix BTF verifier size resolution logic
diff mbox series

Message ID 20190712172557.4039121-2-andriin@fb.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series
  • fix BTF verification size resolution
Related show

Commit Message

Andrii Nakryiko July 12, 2019, 5:25 p.m. UTC
BTF verifier has a size resolution bug which in some circumstances leads to
invalid size resolution for, e.g., TYPEDEF modifier.  This happens if we have
[1] PTR -> [2] TYPEDEF -> [3] ARRAY, in which case due to being in pointer
context ARRAY size won't be resolved (because for pointer it doesn't matter, so
it's a sink in pointer context), but it will be permanently remembered as zero
for TYPEDEF and TYPEDEF will be marked as RESOLVED. Eventually ARRAY size will
be resolved correctly, but TYPEDEF resolved_size won't be updated anymore.
This, subsequently, will lead to erroneous map creation failure, if that
TYPEDEF is specified as either key or value, as key_size/value_size won't
correspond to resolved size of TYPEDEF (kernel will believe it's zero).

Note, that if BTF was ordered as [1] ARRAY <- [2] TYPEDEF <- [3] PTR, this
won't be a problem, as by the time we get to TYPEDEF, ARRAY's size is already
calculated and stored.

This bug manifests itself in rejecting BTF-defined maps that use array
typedef as a value type:

typedef int array_t[16];

struct {
    __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
    __type(value, array_t); /* i.e., array_t *value; */
} test_map SEC(".maps");

The fix consists on not relying on modifier's resolved_size and instead using
modifier's resolved_id (type ID for "concrete" type to which modifier
eventually resolves) and doing size determination for that resolved type. This
allow to preserve existing "early DFS termination" logic for PTR or
STRUCT_OR_ARRAY contexts, but still do correct size determination for modifier
types.

Fixes: eb3f595dab40 ("bpf: btf: Validate type reference")
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Martin Lau July 13, 2019, 4:54 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:25:55AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> BTF verifier has a size resolution bug which in some circumstances leads to
> invalid size resolution for, e.g., TYPEDEF modifier.  This happens if we have
> [1] PTR -> [2] TYPEDEF -> [3] ARRAY, in which case due to being in pointer
> context ARRAY size won't be resolved (because for pointer it doesn't matter, so
> it's a sink in pointer context), but it will be permanently remembered as zero
> for TYPEDEF and TYPEDEF will be marked as RESOLVED. Eventually ARRAY size will
> be resolved correctly, but TYPEDEF resolved_size won't be updated anymore.
> This, subsequently, will lead to erroneous map creation failure, if that
> TYPEDEF is specified as either key or value, as key_size/value_size won't
> correspond to resolved size of TYPEDEF (kernel will believe it's zero).
Thanks for the fix.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 546ebee39e2a..5fcc7a17eb5a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -1073,11 +1073,18 @@  const struct btf_type *btf_type_id_size(const struct btf *btf,
 				 !btf_type_is_var(size_type)))
 			return NULL;
 
-		size = btf->resolved_sizes[size_type_id];
 		size_type_id = btf->resolved_ids[size_type_id];
 		size_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, size_type_id);
 		if (btf_type_nosize_or_null(size_type))
 			return NULL;
+		else if (btf_type_has_size(size_type))
+			size = size_type->size;
+		else if (btf_type_is_array(size_type))
+			size = btf->resolved_sizes[size_type_id];
+		else if (btf_type_is_ptr(size_type))
+			size = sizeof(void *);
+		else
+			return NULL;
 	}
 
 	*type_id = size_type_id;
@@ -1602,7 +1609,6 @@  static int btf_modifier_resolve(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 	const struct btf_type *next_type;
 	u32 next_type_id = t->type;
 	struct btf *btf = env->btf;
-	u32 next_type_size = 0;
 
 	next_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, next_type_id);
 	if (!next_type || btf_type_is_resolve_source_only(next_type)) {
@@ -1620,7 +1626,7 @@  static int btf_modifier_resolve(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 	 * save us a few type-following when we use it later (e.g. in
 	 * pretty print).
 	 */
-	if (!btf_type_id_size(btf, &next_type_id, &next_type_size)) {
+	if (!btf_type_id_size(btf, &next_type_id, NULL)) {
 		if (env_type_is_resolved(env, next_type_id))
 			next_type = btf_type_id_resolve(btf, &next_type_id);
 
@@ -1633,7 +1639,7 @@  static int btf_modifier_resolve(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 		}
 	}
 
-	env_stack_pop_resolved(env, next_type_id, next_type_size);
+	env_stack_pop_resolved(env, next_type_id, 0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1645,7 +1651,6 @@  static int btf_var_resolve(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 	const struct btf_type *t = v->t;
 	u32 next_type_id = t->type;
 	struct btf *btf = env->btf;
-	u32 next_type_size;
 
 	next_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, next_type_id);
 	if (!next_type || btf_type_is_resolve_source_only(next_type)) {
@@ -1675,12 +1680,12 @@  static int btf_var_resolve(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 	 * forward types or similar that would resolve to size of
 	 * zero is allowed.
 	 */
-	if (!btf_type_id_size(btf, &next_type_id, &next_type_size)) {
+	if (!btf_type_id_size(btf, &next_type_id, NULL)) {
 		btf_verifier_log_type(env, v->t, "Invalid type_id");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	env_stack_pop_resolved(env, next_type_id, next_type_size);
+	env_stack_pop_resolved(env, next_type_id, 0);
 
 	return 0;
 }