diff mbox series

[PULL,04/19] migration/multifd: call multifd_send_sync_main when sending RAM_SAVE_FLAG_EOS

Message ID 20190712143207.4214-5-quintela@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series [PULL,01/19] migration: fix multifd_recv event typo | expand

Commit Message

Juan Quintela July 12, 2019, 2:31 p.m. UTC 
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>

On receiving RAM_SAVE_FLAG_EOS, multifd_recv_sync_main() is called to
synchronize receive threads. Current synchronization mechanism is to wait
for each channel's sem_sync semaphore. This semaphore is triggered by a
packet with MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC flag. While in current implementation, we
don't do multifd_send_sync_main() to send such packet when
blk_mig_bulk_active() is true.

This will leads to the receive threads won't notify
multifd_recv_sync_main() by sem_sync. And multifd_recv_sync_main() will
always wait there.

[Note]: normal migration test works, while didn't test the
blk_mig_bulk_active() case. Since not sure how to produce this
situation.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190612014337.11255-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
---
 migration/ram.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index 908517fc2b..74c9306c78 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -3466,8 +3466,8 @@  static int ram_save_iterate(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
      */
     ram_control_after_iterate(f, RAM_CONTROL_ROUND);
 
-    multifd_send_sync_main();
 out:
+    multifd_send_sync_main();
     qemu_put_be64(f, RAM_SAVE_FLAG_EOS);
     qemu_fflush(f);
     ram_counters.transferred += 8;