[bpf] selftests/bpf: fix attach_probe on s390
diff mbox series

Message ID 20190712134142.90668-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series
  • [bpf] selftests/bpf: fix attach_probe on s390
Related show

Commit Message

Ilya Leoshkevich July 12, 2019, 1:41 p.m. UTC
attach_probe test fails, because it cannot install a kprobe on a
non-existent sys_nanosleep symbol.

Use the correct symbol name for the nanosleep syscall on 64-bit s390.
Don't bother adding one for 31-bit mode, since tests are compiled only
in 64-bit mode.

Fixes: 1e8611bbdfc9 ("selftests/bpf: add kprobe/uprobe selftests")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko July 12, 2019, 7:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 6:42 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> attach_probe test fails, because it cannot install a kprobe on a
> non-existent sys_nanosleep symbol.
>
> Use the correct symbol name for the nanosleep syscall on 64-bit s390.
> Don't bother adding one for 31-bit mode, since tests are compiled only
> in 64-bit mode.
>
> Fixes: 1e8611bbdfc9 ("selftests/bpf: add kprobe/uprobe selftests")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>

This arch-specific naming is very unfortunate. I'm thinking of doing
this automatically in libbpf to help usability.


>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> index a4686395522c..47af4afc5013 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ ssize_t get_base_addr() {
>
>  #ifdef __x86_64__
>  #define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
> +#elif defined(__s390x__)
> +#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
>  #else
>  #define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
>  #endif
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Daniel Borkmann July 15, 2019, 10:18 p.m. UTC | #2
On 7/12/19 3:41 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> attach_probe test fails, because it cannot install a kprobe on a
> non-existent sys_nanosleep symbol.
> 
> Use the correct symbol name for the nanosleep syscall on 64-bit s390.
> Don't bother adding one for 31-bit mode, since tests are compiled only
> in 64-bit mode.
> 
> Fixes: 1e8611bbdfc9 ("selftests/bpf: add kprobe/uprobe selftests")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>

Applied, thanks!

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
index a4686395522c..47af4afc5013 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@  ssize_t get_base_addr() {
 
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 #define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
+#elif defined(__s390x__)
+#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
 #else
 #define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
 #endif