Patchwork [18/37] e2fsck: Don't verify bitmap checksums

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Darrick J. Wong
Date Sept. 1, 2011, 12:37 a.m.
Message ID <20110901003706.1176.64563.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/112771/
State Changes Requested
Headers show

Comments

Darrick J. Wong - Sept. 1, 2011, 12:37 a.m.
Since the correct inode and block bitmaps are calculated in pass 5, don't fail
the bitmap read operation in prior passes since (a) incorrect results won't
kill us and (b) if we fail early, we'll never _get_ to pass 5.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---
 e2fsck/util.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

diff --git a/e2fsck/util.c b/e2fsck/util.c
index 22e06c2..61fa3db 100644
--- a/e2fsck/util.c
+++ b/e2fsck/util.c
@@ -224,7 +224,9 @@  void e2fsck_read_bitmaps(e2fsck_t ctx)
 	}
 
 	old_op = ehandler_operation(_("reading inode and block bitmaps"));
+	ctx->fs->flags |= EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 	retval = ext2fs_read_bitmaps(fs);
+	ctx->fs->flags &= ~EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 	ehandler_operation(old_op);
 	if (retval) {
 		com_err(ctx->program_name, retval,