| Message ID | 000101cc63d6$5233f630$f69be290$@liu@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
PING... > -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jiangning Liu > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 5:56 PM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [PATCH, testsuite, ARM] change XFAIL to pass for ARM on a case > testing tree-ssa-dom > > Test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c can pass for -O1 after Richard > Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> fixed something in tree-ssa-dom. The > "link_error" should be optimized away for ARM targets as well. > > The patch is: > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c > index 45e44a1..470b585 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c > @@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y) > that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST). Fix this > by teaching dom to look through && and register all components > as true. */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" > { xfail { ! > "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix- > *-* > mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" > { xfail { ! > "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86- > *-* > mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*- > *" } } } > } */ > /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */ > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2011-08-26 Jiangning Liu <Jiangning.liu@arm.com> > > PR tree-optimization/46021 > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*. > > Thanks, > -Jiangning > > >
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c index 45e44a1..470b585 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c @@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y) that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST). Fix this by teaching dom to look through && and register all components as true. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
Test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c can pass for -O1 after Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> fixed something in tree-ssa-dom. The "link_error" should be optimized away for ARM targets as well. The patch is: +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2011-08-26 Jiangning Liu <Jiangning.liu@arm.com> PR tree-optimization/46021 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*. Thanks, -Jiangning