From patchwork Thu Jun 13 04:47:36 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexei Starovoitov X-Patchwork-Id: 1115387 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45PqSB6T96z9s4Y for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 02:48:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730295AbfFMQsU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:48:20 -0400 Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.153.30]:34884 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730234AbfFMErz (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:47:55 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0001255.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5D4l6pJ013264 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:47:54 -0700 Received: from mail.thefacebook.com (mailout.thefacebook.com [199.201.64.23]) by mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2t3a7dgvrk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:47:54 -0700 Received: from mx-out.facebook.com (2620:10d:c081:10::13) by mail.thefacebook.com (2620:10d:c081:35::125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:47:53 -0700 Received: by devbig007.ftw2.facebook.com (Postfix, from userid 572438) id E8470760C2A; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Smtp-Origin-Hostprefix: devbig From: Alexei Starovoitov Smtp-Origin-Hostname: devbig007.ftw2.facebook.com To: CC: , , , Smtp-Origin-Cluster: ftw2c04 Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: add basic verifier tests for loops Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:47:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20190613044738.3858896-8-ast@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.0 In-Reply-To: <20190613044738.3858896-1-ast@kernel.org> References: <20190613044738.3858896-1-ast@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-FB-Internal: Safe X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-06-13_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=fb_default_notspam policy=fb_default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=751 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906130038 X-FB-Internal: deliver Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org This set of tests is a rewrite of Edward's earlier tests: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/877221/ Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 161 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5e980a5ab69d --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +{ + "bounded loop, count to 4", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .retval = 4, +}, +{ + "bounded loop, count to 20", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 20, -2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +}, +{ + "bounded loop, count from positive unknown to 4", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .retval = 4, +}, +{ + "bounded loop, count from totally unknown to 4", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +}, +{ + "bounded loop, count to 4 with equality", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +}, +{ + "bounded loop, start in the middle", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_A(1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "back-edge", + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .retval = 4, +}, +{ + "bounded loop containing a forward jump", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -3), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .retval = 4, +}, +{ + "bounded loop that jumps out rather than in", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, 10000, 2), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_JMP_A(-4), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +}, +{ + "infinite loop after a conditional jump", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 5), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, 2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_A(-2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "program is too large", + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +}, +{ + "bounded recursion", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, 4, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, -5), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "back-edge", + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +}, +{ + "infinite loop in two jumps", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_A(0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "loop detected", + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +}, +{ + "infinite loop: three-jump trick", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 2, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 2, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 2, -11), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "loop detected", + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, +},