@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static int mtd_do_writeoob(struct file *file, struct mtd_info *mtd,
return ret;
ops.ooblen = length;
- ops.ooboffs = start & (mtd->oobsize - 1);
+ ops.ooboffs = start;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
ops.mode = (mfi->mode == MTD_MODE_RAW) ? MTD_OOB_RAW : MTD_OOB_PLACE;
@@ -422,7 +422,6 @@ static int mtd_do_writeoob(struct file *file, struct mtd_info *mtd,
if (IS_ERR(ops.oobbuf))
return PTR_ERR(ops.oobbuf);
- start &= ~((uint64_t)mtd->oobsize - 1);
ret = mtd->write_oob(mtd, start, &ops);
if (ops.oobretlen > 0xFFFFFFFFU)
@@ -455,7 +454,7 @@ static int mtd_do_readoob(struct file *file, struct mtd_info *mtd,
return ret;
ops.ooblen = length;
- ops.ooboffs = start & (mtd->oobsize - 1);
+ ops.ooboffs = start;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
ops.mode = (mfi->mode == MTD_MODE_RAW) ? MTD_OOB_RAW : MTD_OOB_PLACE;
@@ -466,7 +465,6 @@ static int mtd_do_readoob(struct file *file, struct mtd_info *mtd,
if (!ops.oobbuf)
return -ENOMEM;
- start &= ~((uint64_t)mtd->oobsize - 1);
ret = mtd->read_oob(mtd, start, &ops);
if (put_user(ops.oobretlen, retp))
Previous generations of MTDs all used OOB sizes that were powers of 2, (e.g., 64, 128). However, newer generations of flash, especially NAND, use irregular OOB sizes that are not powers of 2 (e.g., 218, 224, 448). This means we cannot use masks like "mtd->oobsize - 1" to assume that we will get a proper bitmask for OOB operations. As I see it, we don't actually need these masks anyway, so kill them. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> --- drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)