[v2,2/8] soc: tegra: fuse: Use dma_request_channel instead of __dma_request_channel()
diff mbox series

Message ID f1dc31b78b6852bc12a126380816ee32cf78a3f5.1558351667.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series
  • Add matching device node validation in DMA engine core
Related show

Commit Message

Baolin Wang May 20, 2019, 11:32 a.m. UTC
The __dma_request_channel() prototype has been changed to help to do
device node validation, thus we can use dma_request_channel() instead
of __dma_request_channel() to keep kernel bisectable.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
index 49ff017..f40a06f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@  static int tegra20_fuse_probe(struct tegra_fuse *fuse)
 	dma_cap_zero(mask);
 	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
 
-	fuse->apbdma.chan = __dma_request_channel(&mask, dma_filter, NULL);
+	fuse->apbdma.chan = dma_request_channel(mask, dma_filter, NULL);
 	if (!fuse->apbdma.chan)
 		return -EPROBE_DEFER;